Search Site
Menu
Judge Throws Out Trade Secret Theft Claims Based on Whistleblower Immunity

In what is believed to be a first-time occurrence under the Defend Trade Secrets Act, a U.S. District Judge tossed out claims against a person accused of stealing trade secrets based on the DTSA’s rules for immunity for confidential disclosures to attorneys while investigating suspected legal violations.

Under the DTSA, trade secret disclosures made in confidence to a federal, state or local official or to a lawyer are exempt from both criminal and civil liability, so long as that disclosure is made only for the purpose of investigating or reporting a suspected violation of the law.

In this particular case, Christian v. Lannett Co. Inc., an employer filed a counterclaim against a former employee who filed a lawsuit against the company on the basis of gender and disability discrimination. Wendy Christian, the employee in question, kept a company laptop for some time despite being required to return all company property. She eventually returned the laptop after supposedly erasing its hard drive, but did keep some company documents.

This happened before the DTSA went into effect on May 11, 2016. After the DTSA went into effect and during discovery in the case, Christian handed over more than 22,000 pages of documents from her job, which included trade secret material, to her attorneys.

Lannett sued her under the DTSA and other laws, but the U.S. District Judge ultimately ruled the disclosures were protected under that same law.

Stronger whistleblower protections

This case is just the latest example of the strong protections that are now afforded to whistleblowers across the United States. People who are aware of company wrongdoing are able to report that wrongdoing to their attorneys or to investigators and enforcement agencies without having to fear they will lose their job or will be otherwise retaliated against.

For more information on how to proceed with a whistleblower claim, consult a skilled Dallas attorney with Kardell Law Group.

Honors
Our Office
  • Dallas Office
    4514 Cole Ave
    #600
    Dallas, Texas 75205
    Phone: 214-306-8045
    Fax: 469-729-9926
Testimonials
  • "Steve Kardell was terrific in representing me in some very adversarial discussions with Citigroup and also later represented me in my testimony before the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission."  -Richard Bowen, Citigroup Whistleblower

  • "Never thought my career would end like it did after 30 years of service. I was part of the first round of the so called reduction of force. I asked myself how can I be part of this with 30 years of seniority. How did they pick these 90 plus employees? Now, the culture of this organization made you question every decision they made. It wasn’t what you knew it’s was a culture of who you know. Nonetheless, I did not accept their severance package. I immediately starting looking for an attorney who would take on my case. After the initial call to Steve I had hope again. He was open and honest about everything and reassured me he would do his best for me, and he did. I had an awesome outcome. Thanks Steve you’re the best."  -S.S.

  • "Reaching out to Steve Kardell was the best decision I made. His ability to provide immediate insight and direction was very powerful, and a huge relief during a very stressful time period. For anyone struggling with a whistleblower situation, I would highly recommend at least speaking with Steve. After a 10 minute call with him, I had a better understanding of what I was dealing with. Even better, he gave me some immediate hope. In the end Steve did a better job than I thought was possible. Steve was able to get in contact with people in my organization, that I didn’t have access to. Because of his years of experience, he already has contacts in many organizations in Dallas. The entire situation was handled peacefully. I was impressed by his ability to “keep the peace”–rather than creating a battle with the organization. The reason I didn’t reach out to a lawyer initially, was because I thought it would mean an immediate end to any hope of a positive relationship with the company. Steve was able to address my concerns, and in the end I was able to continue to work for them."  -KS

FOLLOW US
Facebook Twitter Linkedin RSS Feed JD Supra