Search Site
Menu
Corporate Ethics Terminations

Dallas Attorney Protects Employees From Retaliatory Corporate Ethics Terminations

What is at-will employment?

At-will employment is the default form of employment in the United States. In most states, you must prove that the employment was not at-will or the court will assume at-will as the default. Compared to just-cause employment, at-will employment does not require any reason, either from the employer or the employee, to terminate the employment relationship. Public policy concerns have limited the harshness of at-will employment to a degree by establishing protected grounds — including race, religion and age — that are impermissible to dismiss employees under. However, the fact remains that employment relationships can be terminated swiftly and for almost any, or no, reason at all. With such broad discretion, it is not at all surprising that managers and executives consult with attorney Steve Kardell.

Why should I be concerned about corporate ethics terminations?

Since the Enron and WorldCom collapses brought about by insider wrongdoing, the U.S government through the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has encouraged companies to establish internal reporting and compliance mechanisms. Unfortunately, following a complaint of wrongdoing or executive malfeasance, the internal compliance machinery all too often investigates the whistleblower rather than the fraud or other bad act reported. The investigation is not limited to the reported act and often looks for any improper behavior by the whistleblower to rid the organization of a troublemaker.

Corporate ethics terminations as a cure-all for whistleblower suits

Unfortunately, corporate ethics terminations as a one-size-fits-all solution are not merely a theoretical possibility. Internal compliance investigations turn the spotlight on the whistleblower in many instances, including:

  • Wiest v. Lynch: The whistleblower alleged accounting improprieties concerning company expense reports. Despite being employed for 31 years, the whistleblower’s background was thoroughly investigated by the company, and it was discovered that he had accepted baseball tickets as a gift from a vendor in violation of company policy. Additionally, he may have made “sexually aggressive” comments in the past and engaged in an “improper relationship” with a former employee. Following these items becoming public, the whistleblower took a leave of absence. He was then fired for ethics violations.
  • Hemphill v. Celanese Corp.: Here, the whistleblower also claimed there were improprieties with expense reports. After he made these allegations, his background was investigated, and it was discovered that he had “yelled” at a secretary over a relatively minor matter. He denied that this event occurred as stated at the internal investigation meeting. He was dismissed, due to the subjective nature of what constitutes yelling.

These wrongful, retaliatory discharges are all too common. Consulting and planning with an experienced whistleblower and internal investigations attorney can help you prepare in advance and avoid this pitfall.

Contact our attorney in the Dallas-Fort Worth area to handle your wrongful corporate ethics termination

If you have been dismissed on corporate ethics grounds or are planning to report wrongdoing, contact experienced attorney Steven Kardell. Appointments may be scheduled by phone at 214-306-8045 or online.

Honors
Our Office
  • Dallas Office
    4514 Cole Ave
    #600
    Dallas, Texas 75205
    Phone: 214-306-8045
    Fax: 469-729-9926
Testimonials
  • "Steve Kardell was terrific in representing me in some very adversarial discussions with Citigroup and also later represented me in my testimony before the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission."  -Richard Bowen, Citigroup Whistleblower

  • "Never thought my career would end like it did after 30 years of service. I was part of the first round of the so called reduction of force. I asked myself how can I be part of this with 30 years of seniority. How did they pick these 90 plus employees? Now, the culture of this organization made you question every decision they made. It wasn’t what you knew it’s was a culture of who you know. Nonetheless, I did not accept their severance package. I immediately starting looking for an attorney who would take on my case. After the initial call to Steve I had hope again. He was open and honest about everything and reassured me he would do his best for me, and he did. I had an awesome outcome. Thanks Steve you’re the best."  -S.S.

  • "Reaching out to Steve Kardell was the best decision I made. His ability to provide immediate insight and direction was very powerful, and a huge relief during a very stressful time period. For anyone struggling with a whistleblower situation, I would highly recommend at least speaking with Steve. After a 10 minute call with him, I had a better understanding of what I was dealing with. Even better, he gave me some immediate hope. In the end Steve did a better job than I thought was possible. Steve was able to get in contact with people in my organization, that I didn’t have access to. Because of his years of experience, he already has contacts in many organizations in Dallas. The entire situation was handled peacefully. I was impressed by his ability to “keep the peace”–rather than creating a battle with the organization. The reason I didn’t reach out to a lawyer initially, was because I thought it would mean an immediate end to any hope of a positive relationship with the company. Steve was able to address my concerns, and in the end I was able to continue to work for them."  -KS

FOLLOW US
Facebook Twitter Linkedin RSS Feed JD Supra