Search Site

How Can You Investigate Employee Misconduct While Someone is on FMLA Leave?

Employers can have a hard time knowing how to handle an internal investigation or disciplining an employee while that employee is taking time off under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA). However, employees are not allowed to use FMLA leave as a shield from discipline for legitimate incidences of wrongdoing.

In one recent case, a middle school teacher was involved in a physical incident with a student in the hallway of a school. The student claimed the teacher grabbed her arm, shook her and then pinned her up against a wall. The teacher, however, had a different story, and after a mandatory investigation by child protective services, the teacher was cleared of wrongdoing. According to district policy, the school board conducted an investigation into the incident as well, which focused on whether the teacher violated any policies of the district during the interaction.

During the school board investigation, the teacher took FMLA leave, citing anxiety, stress and high blood pressure. He was back to work off and on during the following months, but began to have panic attacks at work after the principal “berated” him. While he was on leave, the school demanded he report to work to participate in the board’s investigation and attend a disciplinary hearing, where he was given a written reprimand for using physical contact to escalate a situation with a student.

Eventually, the teacher obtained a doctor’s note requesting to be assigned to a different school in the district to prevent further panic attacks. The district fulfilled the request, and he returned to work after exhausting his FMLA leave. He later sued the district, claiming it interfered with his FMLA leave by requiring him to participate in the investigation, attend appointments with doctors outside of his own physician and return to a school that had students with behavioral issues.

These claims were all quickly dismissed by a trial and appellate court, with a ruling that employers are indeed allowed to request employees to participate in investigations during FMLA leave, within reason.

For more information about FMLA issues and how they impact internal investigations, work with the knowledgeable Dallas whistleblower attorney Steve Kardell at Whistleblower Law for Managers.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Awards & Honors
Our Office
  • Dallas Office
    4514 Cole Ave
    Dallas, Texas 75205
    Phone: 214-306-8045
    Fax: 469-729-9926
As Seen In
In his new book, "Standing Up to China: How a Whistleblower Risked Everything for His Country," former client & Author, Ashley Yablon, quotes Attorney Steve Kardell about Whistelblower Law.
  • "Steve Kardell was terrific in representing me in some very adversarial discussions with Citigroup and also later represented me in my testimony before the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission."  -Richard Bowen, Citigroup Whistleblower

  • "Incredible knowledge of employee related concerns and equally brilliant knowledge of health care regulations, standards of practice. I would recommend this firm to anyone."  -V.B.

  • "Reaching out to Steve Kardell was the best decision I made. His ability to provide immediate insight and direction was very powerful, and a huge relief during a very stressful time period. For anyone struggling with a whistleblower situation, I would highly recommend at least speaking with Steve. After a 10 minute call with him, I had a better understanding of what I was dealing with. Even better, he gave me some immediate hope. In the end Steve did a better job than I thought was possible. Steve was able to get in contact with people in my organization, that I didn’t have access to. Because of his years of experience, he already has contacts in many organizations in Dallas. The entire situation was handled peacefully. I was impressed by his ability to “keep the peace”–rather than creating a battle with the organization. The reason I didn’t reach out to a lawyer initially, was because I thought it would mean an immediate end to any hope of a positive relationship with the company. Steve was able to address my concerns, and in the end I was able to continue to work for them."  -KS

  • "Never thought my career would end like it did after 30 years of service. I was part of the first round of the so called reduction of force. I asked myself how can I be part of this with 30 years of seniority. How did they pick these 90 plus employees? Now, the culture of this organization made you question every decision they made. It wasn’t what you knew it’s was a culture of who you know. Nonetheless, I did not accept their severance package. I immediately starting looking for an attorney who would take on my case. After the initial call to Steve I had hope again. He was open and honest about everything and reassured me he would do his best for me, and he did. I had an awesome outcome. Thanks Steve you’re the best."  -S.S.