Search Site
Menu
Former Bryan Cave Partner Accused of Attempting to Conceal Hack

A former partner at Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner stands accused of encouraging a client to hide information from the Federal Trade Commission revealing that his cybersecurity firm revealed patient data obtained with the use of spying software she supplied while working as a federal prosecutor tracking and fighting against child pornographers.

The lawsuit claims LabMD, a cancer-screening company, was hacked by a cybersecurity firm called Tiversa Inc., which was secretly using government surveillance software. Tiversa disseminated the data it collected on a peer-to-peer file sharing network, then offered remediation services to LabMD. After LabMD refused to hire the company, Tiversa then reported LabMD to the FTC for a data breach, claiming identity thieves stole patient data. This resulted in the FTC bringing a data security enforcement action against LabMD in August 2013.

Mary Beth Buchanan represented a former Tiversa employee, Richard Wallace, in the FTC action, and gave him the surveillance software in 2007 while she was still serving as U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Pennsylvania. She had been working with Tiversa to prosecute child pornographers.

Wallace used that same software to obtain LabMD’s data, but was fired from Tiversa after refusing to lie under oath about how the company used that data in its scheme. He became the whistleblower that blew this case open, and received immunity for his testimony to the FTC.

LabMD accused Buchanan of instructing Wallace to leave out from his testimony the fact that she had provided him access to those surveillance tools.

Whistleblowers often get good deals

The government needs whistleblowers to be able to prosecute many major fraud and racketeering cases. This means even whistleblowers who had initially played a part in these schemes can stand to at least get immunity from prosecution, similar to what happened with Wallace in this case.

It’s never too late to report wrongdoing within a business, organization or government agency. For more information about how to proceed with your whistleblower claim, consult an experienced Dallas lawyer with Kardell Law Group.

Honors
Our Office
  • Dallas Office
    4514 Cole Ave
    #600
    Dallas, Texas 75205
    Phone: 214-306-8045
    Fax: 469-729-9926
Testimonials
  • "Steve Kardell was terrific in representing me in some very adversarial discussions with Citigroup and also later represented me in my testimony before the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission."  -Richard Bowen, Citigroup Whistleblower

  • "Never thought my career would end like it did after 30 years of service. I was part of the first round of the so called reduction of force. I asked myself how can I be part of this with 30 years of seniority. How did they pick these 90 plus employees? Now, the culture of this organization made you question every decision they made. It wasn’t what you knew it’s was a culture of who you know. Nonetheless, I did not accept their severance package. I immediately starting looking for an attorney who would take on my case. After the initial call to Steve I had hope again. He was open and honest about everything and reassured me he would do his best for me, and he did. I had an awesome outcome. Thanks Steve you’re the best."  -S.S.

  • "Reaching out to Steve Kardell was the best decision I made. His ability to provide immediate insight and direction was very powerful, and a huge relief during a very stressful time period. For anyone struggling with a whistleblower situation, I would highly recommend at least speaking with Steve. After a 10 minute call with him, I had a better understanding of what I was dealing with. Even better, he gave me some immediate hope. In the end Steve did a better job than I thought was possible. Steve was able to get in contact with people in my organization, that I didn’t have access to. Because of his years of experience, he already has contacts in many organizations in Dallas. The entire situation was handled peacefully. I was impressed by his ability to “keep the peace”–rather than creating a battle with the organization. The reason I didn’t reach out to a lawyer initially, was because I thought it would mean an immediate end to any hope of a positive relationship with the company. Steve was able to address my concerns, and in the end I was able to continue to work for them."  -KS

FOLLOW US
Facebook Twitter Linkedin RSS Feed JD Supra