Search Site
Menu
Defending preemptive corporate litigation.

When an employer takes the initiative to sue first, there is the possibility of gaining significant advantages. These could include the ability to choose the venue, forum and timing. In regard to the nature of the claim, there could have the option of filing in federal court other than state court, or the positions could be reversed. With the federal filing, it’s possible that a more favorable federal circuit could be available.

At first, the employer/plaintiff will define the issues therefore driving the pre-trial agenda. When an employee/defendant raises issues through counter-claims or defenses, they must firstly respond to the employer’s charges.

The employer/plaintiff will also be able to devise a strategy in advance of filing suit by anticipating the defenses and counterclaims by the employee as well as preparing motion papers, requests for discovery and developing responses.

If the case goes to trial, greater control will be at the hands of the employer/plaintiff over proceedings. Not only will the employer/plaintiff be given their opening statement before the employee and closing statement after the employee, the employer/plaintiff will be called to present their case witnesses first. This schedule of events may allow the employer/plaintiff to cross-examine the employee before he/she has the chance to frame their story from their own perspective.

Honors
Our Office
  • Dallas Office
    4514 Cole Ave
    #600
    Dallas, Texas 75205
    Phone: 214-306-8045
    Fax: 469-729-9926
Testimonials
  • "Steve Kardell was terrific in representing me in some very adversarial discussions with Citigroup and also later represented me in my testimony before the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission."  -Richard Bowen, Citigroup Whistleblower

  • "Incredible knowledge of employee related concerns and equally brilliant knowledge of health care regulations, standards of practice. I would recommend this firm to anyone."  -V.B.

  • "Reaching out to Steve Kardell was the best decision I made. His ability to provide immediate insight and direction was very powerful, and a huge relief during a very stressful time period. For anyone struggling with a whistleblower situation, I would highly recommend at least speaking with Steve. After a 10 minute call with him, I had a better understanding of what I was dealing with. Even better, he gave me some immediate hope. In the end Steve did a better job than I thought was possible. Steve was able to get in contact with people in my organization, that I didn’t have access to. Because of his years of experience, he already has contacts in many organizations in Dallas. The entire situation was handled peacefully. I was impressed by his ability to “keep the peace”–rather than creating a battle with the organization. The reason I didn’t reach out to a lawyer initially, was because I thought it would mean an immediate end to any hope of a positive relationship with the company. Steve was able to address my concerns, and in the end I was able to continue to work for them."  -KS

  • "Never thought my career would end like it did after 30 years of service. I was part of the first round of the so called reduction of force. I asked myself how can I be part of this with 30 years of seniority. How did they pick these 90 plus employees? Now, the culture of this organization made you question every decision they made. It wasn’t what you knew it’s was a culture of who you know. Nonetheless, I did not accept their severance package. I immediately starting looking for an attorney who would take on my case. After the initial call to Steve I had hope again. He was open and honest about everything and reassured me he would do his best for me, and he did. I had an awesome outcome. Thanks Steve you’re the best."  -S.S.

FOLLOW US
Facebook Twitter Linkedin RSS Feed JD Supra