Search Site

Whistleblower Alleges Discrimination, Claims Morbid Obesity is Legal Disability

The Eighth Circuit may reopen the 2013 case of a Kansas man who alleges the BNSF Railway Co. revoked his job offer because he was obese. The man, Melvin A. Morriss III, asserts that per the Americans with Disabilities Act, morbid obesity is a disability and that BNSF’s action was discrimination.

Morriss claims his obesity is not just a physical characteristic, but also rather a physiological disorder. He is appealing the result of his original complaint in which he alleged he was able to pass all tests for the employment position as machinist. Morriss stated that BNSF arranged for him to take a physical and then afterward revoked the job offer.

In response, BNSF stated that Morriss’ morbid obesity was cause for concern because of health and safety risks that could arise from his condition. BNSF asserted that previous court cases have demonstrated that obesity is only considered an impairment if it results from a physiological disorder, and that Morriss failed to show evidence proving his obesity was an impairment.

Morriss argued that BNSF had a mistaken understanding of laws surrounding obesity and impairment, and that recent updates to the American Disabilities Act have changed what constitutes a disability. Morriss also claimed that BNSF must have thought he was impaired otherwise the company would have no justification for pulling the job offer.

Given that approximately one-third of workers in United States are obese, the outcome of Morriss’ appeal can have a significant impact on public policy, business and advocacy. Organizations such as AARP Inc., the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the Equal Employment Advisory Council are following the case. In response to the appeal, the Chamber of Commerce has noted that employer liability would be seriously affected should the trial rule in favor of Morriss.

In response to public interest in his claims, Morriss has stated that it would be unjust to let the potential impact of his case on employers influence the outcome of his appeal.

If you believe you have been wrongfully discriminated against, meet with Steve Kardell at Whistleblower Law for Managers today. 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Awards & Honors
Our Office
  • Dallas Office
    4514 Cole Ave
    Dallas, Texas 75205
    Phone: 214-306-8045
    Fax: 469-729-9926
As Seen In
In his new book, "Standing Up to China: How a Whistleblower Risked Everything for His Country," former client & Author, Ashley Yablon, quotes Attorney Steve Kardell about Whistelblower Law.
  • "Steve Kardell was terrific in representing me in some very adversarial discussions with Citigroup and also later represented me in my testimony before the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission."  -Richard Bowen, Citigroup Whistleblower

  • "Incredible knowledge of employee related concerns and equally brilliant knowledge of health care regulations, standards of practice. I would recommend this firm to anyone."  -V.B.

  • "Reaching out to Steve Kardell was the best decision I made. His ability to provide immediate insight and direction was very powerful, and a huge relief during a very stressful time period. For anyone struggling with a whistleblower situation, I would highly recommend at least speaking with Steve. After a 10 minute call with him, I had a better understanding of what I was dealing with. Even better, he gave me some immediate hope. In the end Steve did a better job than I thought was possible. Steve was able to get in contact with people in my organization, that I didn’t have access to. Because of his years of experience, he already has contacts in many organizations in Dallas. The entire situation was handled peacefully. I was impressed by his ability to “keep the peace”–rather than creating a battle with the organization. The reason I didn’t reach out to a lawyer initially, was because I thought it would mean an immediate end to any hope of a positive relationship with the company. Steve was able to address my concerns, and in the end I was able to continue to work for them."  -KS

  • "Never thought my career would end like it did after 30 years of service. I was part of the first round of the so called reduction of force. I asked myself how can I be part of this with 30 years of seniority. How did they pick these 90 plus employees? Now, the culture of this organization made you question every decision they made. It wasn’t what you knew it’s was a culture of who you know. Nonetheless, I did not accept their severance package. I immediately starting looking for an attorney who would take on my case. After the initial call to Steve I had hope again. He was open and honest about everything and reassured me he would do his best for me, and he did. I had an awesome outcome. Thanks Steve you’re the best."  -S.S.