Search Site
Menu
US Government Takes on Navy Contractor in Environmental Fraud Case

The federal government is set to prosecute three whistleblower complaints against a contractor for the U.S. Navy accused of large-scale fraud. The action takes place in the middle of a billion-dollar cleanup of a shipyard that had been contaminated with radiation that was to be the site of a new development.

Seven whistleblowers accused Tetra Tech, the contractor in question, of submitting falsified soil test results during the project. The tests were issued to verify that the 400-acre site of 10,000 future homes had been properly decontaminated. The redevelopment project is one of the largest in the history of San Francisco.

Details of the case

Tetra Tech was hired for more than $250 million to work on the Hunters Point project between 2006 and 2012. The site had been a Navy shipyard in the Bayview neighborhood of San Francisco. It had once held top-secret nuclear tests (between 1946 and 1969), and was a place where ships that returned from hydrogen bomb test sites would be decontaminated. As a result, there were concerns about radioactive waste that could make developing the site a challenge.

Whistleblowers in the case claim a manager at Tetra Tech ordered workers to destroy some lab results for post-cleanup soil samples that had extremely high radioactivity readings — among the highest ever obtained at Hunters Point. The complaints allege workers were also instructed to take samples from other areas of the site, avoiding those that were more likely to be so-called “hot spots” for radioactivity.

In addition, the lawsuits alleged the contractor and its subcontractors hired unqualified workers for the project and routinely failed to dispose of hazardous materials properly. Two former employees of Tetra Tech already pleaded guilty to falsifying reports and are serving eight-month prison sentences.

If you are aware of any fraud or wrongdoing within your business or organization, you have a responsibility to report it. You will be protected under federal law for doing so. Contact a trusted whistleblower attorney at Kardell Law Group for further guidance.

Honors
Our Office
  • Dallas Office
    4514 Cole Ave
    #600
    Dallas, Texas 75205
    Phone: 214-306-8045
    Fax: 469-729-9926
Testimonials
  • "Steve Kardell was terrific in representing me in some very adversarial discussions with Citigroup and also later represented me in my testimony before the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission."  -Richard Bowen, Citigroup Whistleblower

  • "Never thought my career would end like it did after 30 years of service. I was part of the first round of the so called reduction of force. I asked myself how can I be part of this with 30 years of seniority. How did they pick these 90 plus employees? Now, the culture of this organization made you question every decision they made. It wasn’t what you knew it’s was a culture of who you know. Nonetheless, I did not accept their severance package. I immediately starting looking for an attorney who would take on my case. After the initial call to Steve I had hope again. He was open and honest about everything and reassured me he would do his best for me, and he did. I had an awesome outcome. Thanks Steve you’re the best."  -S.S.

  • "Reaching out to Steve Kardell was the best decision I made. His ability to provide immediate insight and direction was very powerful, and a huge relief during a very stressful time period. For anyone struggling with a whistleblower situation, I would highly recommend at least speaking with Steve. After a 10 minute call with him, I had a better understanding of what I was dealing with. Even better, he gave me some immediate hope. In the end Steve did a better job than I thought was possible. Steve was able to get in contact with people in my organization, that I didn’t have access to. Because of his years of experience, he already has contacts in many organizations in Dallas. The entire situation was handled peacefully. I was impressed by his ability to “keep the peace”–rather than creating a battle with the organization. The reason I didn’t reach out to a lawyer initially, was because I thought it would mean an immediate end to any hope of a positive relationship with the company. Steve was able to address my concerns, and in the end I was able to continue to work for them."  -KS

FOLLOW US
Facebook Twitter Linkedin RSS Feed JD Supra