Search Site
Menu
To Blow or Not to Blow — this is the Whistleblower’s Question

Cheryl D. Eckard was drug giant GlaxoSmithKline’s (GSK) quality manager. In 2002, she was sent to the company’s primary plant in Puerto Rico to fix problems cited by the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA). Eckard quickly recognized that the company’s premier drug-making facility was a disaster. She recorded and reported to senior managers that the plant’s water system was overcrowded, pills of varying strengths were placed in the same bottles, the warehouse was overcrowded and vans were being used for storage. Eckard complained to company executives and was fired. She proceeded to file a complaint with the FDA. GSK eventually settled for $750 million with the Justice Department, with Eckard receiving more than $96 million from the Federal and State governments for her role as a whistleblower under the False Claims Act.

Millions of reasons to blow the whistle

The Internal Revenue Service, Securities and Exchange Commission and many other government agencies award a percentage of the monies recovered from the violating companies to the whistleblower that provides the information leading to the fine.

A worker who successfully blows the whistle on their companies may receive a large financial reward after a long legal battle. For example, when Laura Davis first reported that her employer, Dialysis Corporation of America (DCA), was overcharging the U.S. government for medicines, co-workers and managers ignored her. When she hired a whistleblower lawyer and sued, her supervisors paid attention to her claims and settled for $7.3 million. Davis’ share of the settlement totaled $1.3 million.

Bradley C. Birkenfeld blew the whistle on the Swiss banking system and revealed how UBS helped hundreds of Americans avoid paying taxes. Birkenfeld’s award was $104 million.

Another advantage of whistleblowing is its effectiveness in controlling corporate crime. In a survey of 5,400 CEOs, CFOs and CCOs conducted by PriceWaterhouseCoopers, results showed that the whistleblowers are the most effective source in combating corporate criminal activity.

Blowing the whistle may force you to learn a new career

One reason that people do not blow the whistle is the fear of losing their livelihood. Whistleblowers undergo a lengthy legal battle that may last years.

Another common consequence of whistleblowing is losing your livelihood. Sherron Watkins, Vice-President for Corporate Development of Enron, illustrates this point. She blew the whistle on Enron’s creative accounting and fraud practices, which led to Enron’s bankruptcy. Watkins insists that she will never be able to work again in corporate America because management is too afraid to have someone like her on their team.

If you believe that you possess evidence of misconduct or fraud conducted by your employer, consult with a Texas whistleblower attorney.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Honors
Our Office
  • Dallas Office
    4514 Cole Ave
    #600
    Dallas, Texas 75205
    Phone: 214-306-8045
    Fax: 469-729-9926
Testimonials
  • "Steve Kardell was terrific in representing me in some very adversarial discussions with Citigroup and also later represented me in my testimony before the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission."  -Richard Bowen, Citigroup Whistleblower

  • "Incredible knowledge of employee related concerns and equally brilliant knowledge of health care regulations, standards of practice. I would recommend this firm to anyone."  -V.B.

  • "Reaching out to Steve Kardell was the best decision I made. His ability to provide immediate insight and direction was very powerful, and a huge relief during a very stressful time period. For anyone struggling with a whistleblower situation, I would highly recommend at least speaking with Steve. After a 10 minute call with him, I had a better understanding of what I was dealing with. Even better, he gave me some immediate hope. In the end Steve did a better job than I thought was possible. Steve was able to get in contact with people in my organization, that I didn’t have access to. Because of his years of experience, he already has contacts in many organizations in Dallas. The entire situation was handled peacefully. I was impressed by his ability to “keep the peace”–rather than creating a battle with the organization. The reason I didn’t reach out to a lawyer initially, was because I thought it would mean an immediate end to any hope of a positive relationship with the company. Steve was able to address my concerns, and in the end I was able to continue to work for them."  -KS

  • "Never thought my career would end like it did after 30 years of service. I was part of the first round of the so called reduction of force. I asked myself how can I be part of this with 30 years of seniority. How did they pick these 90 plus employees? Now, the culture of this organization made you question every decision they made. It wasn’t what you knew it’s was a culture of who you know. Nonetheless, I did not accept their severance package. I immediately starting looking for an attorney who would take on my case. After the initial call to Steve I had hope again. He was open and honest about everything and reassured me he would do his best for me, and he did. I had an awesome outcome. Thanks Steve you’re the best."  -S.S.

FOLLOW US
Facebook Twitter Linkedin RSS Feed JD Supra