Search Site
Menu
Supreme Court to Hear Case Involving Whistleblower Retaliation

The U.S. Supreme Court announced it will take up a case that could determine if corporate whistleblowers have the same protections against retaliation when they report their concerns about misconduct internally as they do when they report them to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

The case in question is Digital Realty Trust v. Somers. The real estate investment trust has issued challenges to rulings in lower courts in a case that Mr. Somers, a former vice president of the firm, originally brought.

Somers says he was fired after submitting complaints to senior management about actions by his supervisor that were allegedly in violation of Sarbanes-Oxley Act securities regulations. Somers filed his lawsuit under a whistleblower anti-retaliation provision of the Dodd-Frank Act.

Digital Realty Trust argued that Somers’ claim should not proceed because he did not complain to the SEC. The company claims the definition of “whistleblower” under the Dodd-Frank Act requires reporting of wrongdoing to the agency. Because Somers did not do so, Digital Realty Trust claims he is not entitled to whistleblower protections.

Case could affect future whistleblower actions

There is an SEC regulation that states whistleblowers are entitled to Dodd-Frank protections regardless of whether wrongdoing is reported to the SEC or the employer. The SEC also offers rewards to whistleblowers who report their concerns internally before taking them to the federal government.

Some legal experts believe that if Somers loses the case, future whistleblowers will start taking their complaints directly to the SEC rather than bothering to report them internally, an outcome that would not be particularly beneficial for businesses. They would not have the opportunity to resolve potential violations of securities laws before they are subjected to SEC enforcement actions.

To learn more about the protections available to you if you choose to serve as a whistleblower, meet with an experienced Dallas attorney at Whistleblower Law for Managers.

Honors
Our Office
  • Dallas Office
    4514 Cole Ave
    #600
    Dallas, Texas 75205
    Phone: 214-306-8045
    Fax: 469-729-9926
Testimonials
  • "Steve Kardell was terrific in representing me in some very adversarial discussions with Citigroup and also later represented me in my testimony before the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission."  -Richard Bowen, Citigroup Whistleblower

  • "Never thought my career would end like it did after 30 years of service. I was part of the first round of the so called reduction of force. I asked myself how can I be part of this with 30 years of seniority. How did they pick these 90 plus employees? Now, the culture of this organization made you question every decision they made. It wasn’t what you knew it’s was a culture of who you know. Nonetheless, I did not accept their severance package. I immediately starting looking for an attorney who would take on my case. After the initial call to Steve I had hope again. He was open and honest about everything and reassured me he would do his best for me, and he did. I had an awesome outcome. Thanks Steve you’re the best."  -S.S.

  • "Reaching out to Steve Kardell was the best decision I made. His ability to provide immediate insight and direction was very powerful, and a huge relief during a very stressful time period. For anyone struggling with a whistleblower situation, I would highly recommend at least speaking with Steve. After a 10 minute call with him, I had a better understanding of what I was dealing with. Even better, he gave me some immediate hope. In the end Steve did a better job than I thought was possible. Steve was able to get in contact with people in my organization, that I didn’t have access to. Because of his years of experience, he already has contacts in many organizations in Dallas. The entire situation was handled peacefully. I was impressed by his ability to “keep the peace”–rather than creating a battle with the organization. The reason I didn’t reach out to a lawyer initially, was because I thought it would mean an immediate end to any hope of a positive relationship with the company. Steve was able to address my concerns, and in the end I was able to continue to work for them."  -KS

FOLLOW US
Facebook Twitter Linkedin RSS Feed JD Supra