Search Site
Menu

Sixth Circuit Provides Clarification on False Claims Act Whistleblower Statute of Limitations

On January 10, 2022, the Sixth Circuit ruled the statute of limitations period for False Claims Act whistleblower retaliation cases begins when the whistleblower is first notified of the adverse retaliatory action.

This clarification came in the ruling of El-Khalil v. Oakwood Healthcare, Inc.

Case background

The plaintiff in the case, El-Khalil, witnessed employees of Oakwood Healthcare submitting fraudulent claims to Medicare, which he then reported to the federal government. In 2015, the healthcare system’s Medical Executive Committee rejected El-Khalil’s application to renew his position as a podiatrist on staff.

He appeared in front of Oakwood’s Joint Conference Committee on September 22, 2016. The JFCC voted to affirm the Medical Executive Committee’s decision, and informed El-Khalil on September 27.

Three years later, on September 27, 2019, El-Khalil sued Oakwood for retaliation under the False Claims Act. Oakwood, however, moved for summary dismissal because the claim was not filed in a timely manner according to FCA rules.

The Sixth Circuit agreed with a district court decision that the text of the FCA unequivocally states that a whistleblower action “may not be brought more than three years after the date when the retaliation occurred.” This means the statute of limitations period begins as soon as the plaintiff can file a suit, not when the plaintiff discovers the retaliation. This meant that the start of the statute of limitations was September 22, not September 27.

The implications of this case are clear for whistleblowers; it is critical to be efficient and expedient when preparing to file a FCA case or other type of whistleblower retaliation claim. Some types of whistleblower cases have very short statutes of limitations and others provide more time. If you believe you have a case, you should connect with a whistleblower attorney as soon as possible so you can be sure you meet all necessary deadlines.

For more information about the process of a FCA case and what to do if you have been a victim of whistleblower retaliation, contact an experienced whistleblower lawyer at Kardell Law Group. Our team of skilled attorneys is pleased to guide you through your legal issues.

Honors
Our Office
  • Dallas Office
    4514 Cole Ave
    #600
    Dallas, Texas 75205
    Phone: 214-306-8045
    Fax: 469-729-9926
Testimonials
  • "Steve Kardell was terrific in representing me in some very adversarial discussions with Citigroup and also later represented me in my testimony before the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission."  -Richard Bowen, Citigroup Whistleblower

  • "Incredible knowledge of employee related concerns and equally brilliant knowledge of health care regulations, standards of practice. I would recommend this firm to anyone."  -V.B.

  • "Reaching out to Steve Kardell was the best decision I made. His ability to provide immediate insight and direction was very powerful, and a huge relief during a very stressful time period. For anyone struggling with a whistleblower situation, I would highly recommend at least speaking with Steve. After a 10 minute call with him, I had a better understanding of what I was dealing with. Even better, he gave me some immediate hope. In the end Steve did a better job than I thought was possible. Steve was able to get in contact with people in my organization, that I didn’t have access to. Because of his years of experience, he already has contacts in many organizations in Dallas. The entire situation was handled peacefully. I was impressed by his ability to “keep the peace”–rather than creating a battle with the organization. The reason I didn’t reach out to a lawyer initially, was because I thought it would mean an immediate end to any hope of a positive relationship with the company. Steve was able to address my concerns, and in the end I was able to continue to work for them."  -KS

  • "Never thought my career would end like it did after 30 years of service. I was part of the first round of the so called reduction of force. I asked myself how can I be part of this with 30 years of seniority. How did they pick these 90 plus employees? Now, the culture of this organization made you question every decision they made. It wasn’t what you knew it’s was a culture of who you know. Nonetheless, I did not accept their severance package. I immediately starting looking for an attorney who would take on my case. After the initial call to Steve I had hope again. He was open and honest about everything and reassured me he would do his best for me, and he did. I had an awesome outcome. Thanks Steve you’re the best."  -S.S.

FOLLOW US
Facebook Twitter Linkedin RSS Feed JD Supra