Search Site
Menu
Recent Cases in Pennsylvania Reflect Potential Expansion of Damages Available to Whistleblowers

With more employees than ever becoming aware of the federal protections available for whistleblowers, there has been a corresponding rise in unhappy workers looking to sue their former employers. However, in at-will employment states like Pennsylvania, proceeding with these claims is not always a viable prospect.

Recent trends, however, appear to provide greater relief to employees. There has been growing case law establishing that plaintiffs in whistleblower retaliation cases can recover for noneconomic damages, such as emotional distress and humiliation, in addition to their standard compensatory damages. These trends have made whistleblower claims more attractive to attorneys in at-will employment states who might have previously been hesitant to take them on.

Should whistleblowers be able to recover noneconomic damages?

The ability of plaintiffs to recover noneconomic damages in whistleblower lawsuits has been the subject of heated debate in Pennsylvania state courts, and many experts predict the Pennsylvania Supreme Court will soon rule in the matter. However, decisions in several recent cases have trended toward loosening historical restrictions for whistleblowers.

For example, a plaintiff recently received $3.2 million — including $1.6 million in noneconomic damages — in a lawsuit against the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission. The plaintiff’s attorney successfully argued that whistleblower cases must include compensation for the reputational damage and mental anguish the victim suffered. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court is set to review the case soon.

Currently, state law outlines that awards in such cases must ensure plaintiffs are “in no worse a position for having exposed the wrongdoing,” but there is nothing in the law that explicitly covers the issue of noneconomic damages.

For more information on how this case could affect other whistleblower regulations across the country, speak with an experienced Dallas attorney at Whistleblower Law for Managers.

 

Honors
Our Office
  • Dallas Office
    4514 Cole Ave
    #600
    Dallas, Texas 75205
    Phone: 214-306-8045
    Fax: 469-729-9926
Testimonials
  • "Steve Kardell was terrific in representing me in some very adversarial discussions with Citigroup and also later represented me in my testimony before the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission."  -Richard Bowen, Citigroup Whistleblower

  • "Never thought my career would end like it did after 30 years of service. I was part of the first round of the so called reduction of force. I asked myself how can I be part of this with 30 years of seniority. How did they pick these 90 plus employees? Now, the culture of this organization made you question every decision they made. It wasn’t what you knew it’s was a culture of who you know. Nonetheless, I did not accept their severance package. I immediately starting looking for an attorney who would take on my case. After the initial call to Steve I had hope again. He was open and honest about everything and reassured me he would do his best for me, and he did. I had an awesome outcome. Thanks Steve you’re the best."  -S.S.

  • "Reaching out to Steve Kardell was the best decision I made. His ability to provide immediate insight and direction was very powerful, and a huge relief during a very stressful time period. For anyone struggling with a whistleblower situation, I would highly recommend at least speaking with Steve. After a 10 minute call with him, I had a better understanding of what I was dealing with. Even better, he gave me some immediate hope. In the end Steve did a better job than I thought was possible. Steve was able to get in contact with people in my organization, that I didn’t have access to. Because of his years of experience, he already has contacts in many organizations in Dallas. The entire situation was handled peacefully. I was impressed by his ability to “keep the peace”–rather than creating a battle with the organization. The reason I didn’t reach out to a lawyer initially, was because I thought it would mean an immediate end to any hope of a positive relationship with the company. Steve was able to address my concerns, and in the end I was able to continue to work for them."  -KS

FOLLOW US
Facebook Twitter Linkedin RSS Feed JD Supra