Search Site
Menu
Novartis Whistleblower Awarded $1.5 Million in Retaliation Lawsuit

Four years ago, Min Amy Guo, a former executive with drug company Novartis, filed a lawsuit against the company, alleging wrongful termination after she raised concerns that a drug study may be a type of kickback. Now, the case has finally concluded with a jury ruling in her favor and awarding her $1.5 million.

The study focused on Afinitor, a cancer drug, and was to be conducted by McKesson, a drug distribution company. Novartis initially proposed the study in 2012, but rather than assigning the project to her team, as would have been the standard protocol considering she ran the Health Economics and Outcomes Research Group for the company, the study was instead given to the Oncology Scientific Operations-Managed Markets group, a team that primarily focuses on client interaction.

Another Novartis executive eventually raised the same concerns Go did, and the company canceled the contract. However, Guo claimed Novartis still retaliated against her and fired her for blowing the whistle.

This was not the first time Novartis has been claimed of violating anti-kickback laws. The company has also been the subject of allegations that it was regularly buying scripts with kickbacks to doctors. The company also was the center of national controversy after revelations it paid former Donald Trump personal attorney Michael Cohen $1.2 million for consulting services as the presidential transition was ongoing.

Courts take whistleblower retaliation seriously

Businesses and organizations already stand to be heavily punished when they violate state or federal laws. However, the penalties they face become even more significant when they attempt to silence whistleblowers through retaliation or termination. Federal law affords whistleblowers some significant protections against retaliation, and whistleblowers who lose their jobs for speaking up stand to earn significant amounts of money in some cases.

For further guidance on the steps you should take if you are the victim of whistleblower retaliation, contact an experienced attorney with Kardell Law Group.

Honors
Our Office
  • Dallas Office
    4514 Cole Ave
    #600
    Dallas, Texas 75205
    Phone: 214-306-8045
    Fax: 469-729-9926
Testimonials
  • "Steve Kardell was terrific in representing me in some very adversarial discussions with Citigroup and also later represented me in my testimony before the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission."  -Richard Bowen, Citigroup Whistleblower

  • "Never thought my career would end like it did after 30 years of service. I was part of the first round of the so called reduction of force. I asked myself how can I be part of this with 30 years of seniority. How did they pick these 90 plus employees? Now, the culture of this organization made you question every decision they made. It wasn’t what you knew it’s was a culture of who you know. Nonetheless, I did not accept their severance package. I immediately starting looking for an attorney who would take on my case. After the initial call to Steve I had hope again. He was open and honest about everything and reassured me he would do his best for me, and he did. I had an awesome outcome. Thanks Steve you’re the best."  -S.S.

  • "Reaching out to Steve Kardell was the best decision I made. His ability to provide immediate insight and direction was very powerful, and a huge relief during a very stressful time period. For anyone struggling with a whistleblower situation, I would highly recommend at least speaking with Steve. After a 10 minute call with him, I had a better understanding of what I was dealing with. Even better, he gave me some immediate hope. In the end Steve did a better job than I thought was possible. Steve was able to get in contact with people in my organization, that I didn’t have access to. Because of his years of experience, he already has contacts in many organizations in Dallas. The entire situation was handled peacefully. I was impressed by his ability to “keep the peace”–rather than creating a battle with the organization. The reason I didn’t reach out to a lawyer initially, was because I thought it would mean an immediate end to any hope of a positive relationship with the company. Steve was able to address my concerns, and in the end I was able to continue to work for them."  -KS

FOLLOW US
Facebook Twitter Linkedin RSS Feed JD Supra