Search Site

NLRB Ruling Offers More Protections to Employees in Internal Investigations

Many businesses and organizations will, at some point, need to conduct an internal investigation into possible employee misconduct, whether it’s just as a preventive measure or if there’s actual suspected wrongdoing at play.

The National Labor Relations Act makes sure employees have the right to take action to receive protection or mutual aid, including the right to discuss any disciplinary matters or investigations involving their coworkers or themselves. Therefore, there’s always a sort of tension existing between the employer’s vested interest in making sure its investigation is not interfered with and an employee’s right to discuss the investigation with coworkers.

A 2012 ruling from the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) in Banner Estrella held that there must always be a balance between these ever-competing interests of employers and employees. The ruling stated that employers must demonstrate that any requests for confidentiality that would somehow interfere with employees’ rights to discuss the ongoing investigation must be supported by evidence showing the employer has a legitimate business-related reason for seeking a confidentiality requirement. Examples could be situations in which the company must protect witnesses and/or if there was a need to prevent some sort of cover-up.

However, in its decision the U.S. Supreme Court, in Noel Canning, sent the case back to the NLRB. On June 26, a majority of the board determined once again that “blanket confidentiality” requirements are unlawful. This latest decision once again states employers must have a reasonable basis for asking for confidentiality during investigations.

For more information on how this ruling could affect how you go through internal investigations within your business or organization, speak with skilled Dallas Attorney Steve Kardell at Whistleblower Law for Managers.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Awards & Honors
Our Office
  • Dallas Office
    4514 Cole Ave
    Dallas, Texas 75205
    Phone: 214-306-8045
    Fax: 469-729-9926
As Seen In
In his new book, "Standing Up to China: How a Whistleblower Risked Everything for His Country," former client & Author, Ashley Yablon, quotes Attorney Steve Kardell about Whistelblower Law.
  • "Steve Kardell was terrific in representing me in some very adversarial discussions with Citigroup and also later represented me in my testimony before the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission."  -Richard Bowen, Citigroup Whistleblower

  • "Incredible knowledge of employee related concerns and equally brilliant knowledge of health care regulations, standards of practice. I would recommend this firm to anyone."  -V.B.

  • "Reaching out to Steve Kardell was the best decision I made. His ability to provide immediate insight and direction was very powerful, and a huge relief during a very stressful time period. For anyone struggling with a whistleblower situation, I would highly recommend at least speaking with Steve. After a 10 minute call with him, I had a better understanding of what I was dealing with. Even better, he gave me some immediate hope. In the end Steve did a better job than I thought was possible. Steve was able to get in contact with people in my organization, that I didn’t have access to. Because of his years of experience, he already has contacts in many organizations in Dallas. The entire situation was handled peacefully. I was impressed by his ability to “keep the peace”–rather than creating a battle with the organization. The reason I didn’t reach out to a lawyer initially, was because I thought it would mean an immediate end to any hope of a positive relationship with the company. Steve was able to address my concerns, and in the end I was able to continue to work for them."  -KS

  • "Never thought my career would end like it did after 30 years of service. I was part of the first round of the so called reduction of force. I asked myself how can I be part of this with 30 years of seniority. How did they pick these 90 plus employees? Now, the culture of this organization made you question every decision they made. It wasn’t what you knew it’s was a culture of who you know. Nonetheless, I did not accept their severance package. I immediately starting looking for an attorney who would take on my case. After the initial call to Steve I had hope again. He was open and honest about everything and reassured me he would do his best for me, and he did. I had an awesome outcome. Thanks Steve you’re the best."  -S.S.