Search Site

New York Boosts its Whistleblower Protections

As of January 26, 2022, some new, enhanced whistleblower protections went into effect in the state of New York.

The changes to the law were as follows:

  • The state change the definition of an “employee” in Labor Law 740 to include former employees and independent contractors.
  • The state extended the statute of limitations from one to two years.
  • The state added additional entitlements for plaintiffs. They already had the right to seek reinstatement, back pay, attorney’s fees and injunctive relief, and now they also are entitled to jury trials and recovery of punitive damages and front pay.
  • The revisions make it so retaliatory actions are no longer limited to any actual adverse employment actions taken by the employer (termination, suspension, demotion, reassignment) but now include any “actions or threats to take such action that would adversely impact a former employee’s current or future employment.”
  • The law changes and expands what constitutes protected whistleblower activity. In the old rules, employees were engaged in protected activity when they disclosed or threatened to disclose an activity, practice or policy of an employer that violated a law, regulation or rule in such a manner that it posed a substantial danger to public health or safety or constituted healthcare fraud. Now, employees are engaged in protected activity if they “reasonably believe” the employer is acting in violation of those laws or regulations.
  • The state adds several exceptions to the requirement that an employee first report the violation to their supervisor internally to allow the employer a chance to correct the wrongdoing. One example is if an employee reasonably believes the supervisor is already aware of the policy and will not correct it.
  • The state now requires New York employers to post notices informing employees of their protections, rights and obligations under revised whistleblower laws.

Employers should familiarize themselves with all of these changes and take any internal actions necessary to accommodate them. Every employer must have strong reporting and anti-retaliation policies to prevent whistleblower retaliation from becoming an issue, and create a positive and open company culture.

For more information about the whistleblower protections available in your area, contact an experienced whistleblower lawyer at Kardell Law Group.

Awards & Honors
Our Office
  • Dallas Office
    4514 Cole Ave
    Dallas, Texas 75205
    Phone: 214-306-8045
    Fax: 469-729-9926
As Seen In
In his new book, "Standing Up to China: How a Whistleblower Risked Everything for His Country," former client & Author, Ashley Yablon, quotes Attorney Steve Kardell about Whistelblower Law.
  • "Steve Kardell was terrific in representing me in some very adversarial discussions with Citigroup and also later represented me in my testimony before the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission."  -Richard Bowen, Citigroup Whistleblower

  • "Incredible knowledge of employee related concerns and equally brilliant knowledge of health care regulations, standards of practice. I would recommend this firm to anyone."  -V.B.

  • "Reaching out to Steve Kardell was the best decision I made. His ability to provide immediate insight and direction was very powerful, and a huge relief during a very stressful time period. For anyone struggling with a whistleblower situation, I would highly recommend at least speaking with Steve. After a 10 minute call with him, I had a better understanding of what I was dealing with. Even better, he gave me some immediate hope. In the end Steve did a better job than I thought was possible. Steve was able to get in contact with people in my organization, that I didn’t have access to. Because of his years of experience, he already has contacts in many organizations in Dallas. The entire situation was handled peacefully. I was impressed by his ability to “keep the peace”–rather than creating a battle with the organization. The reason I didn’t reach out to a lawyer initially, was because I thought it would mean an immediate end to any hope of a positive relationship with the company. Steve was able to address my concerns, and in the end I was able to continue to work for them."  -KS

  • "Never thought my career would end like it did after 30 years of service. I was part of the first round of the so called reduction of force. I asked myself how can I be part of this with 30 years of seniority. How did they pick these 90 plus employees? Now, the culture of this organization made you question every decision they made. It wasn’t what you knew it’s was a culture of who you know. Nonetheless, I did not accept their severance package. I immediately starting looking for an attorney who would take on my case. After the initial call to Steve I had hope again. He was open and honest about everything and reassured me he would do his best for me, and he did. I had an awesome outcome. Thanks Steve you’re the best."  -S.S.