Search Site
Menu
Is the SEC Relying Less on Businesses’ Self-Policing?

A notable increase in the number of whistleblower awards the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has given out this year has led many legal analysts to conclude that the agency is no longer leaning on companies to self-report potential wrongdoing.

In June alone, the agency granted more than $17 million to a single whistleblower, the second-largest award it has offered since its whistleblower program began in 2011 as part of the Dodd-Frank Act. This came after a busy May for the SEC, in which it provided nearly $10 million in awards to four different individuals.

According to a statement from SEC Office of the Whistleblower Chief Sean McKessy, the increases are a result of high-quality tips provided to the agency and greater public awareness of the whistleblower program overall.

A noted change in the SEC’s approach

However, some legal scholars point out that these increases have coincided with another trend — the fact that the SEC may be relying less on organizations’ self-policing and more on the disclosures of employees, who are now more incentivized to go straight to the SEC instead of first filing an internal complaint.

Seeing these trends, it’s advisable for corporate leaders to create a culture in which employees feel more comfortable going to their supervisors with their reports. One of the employees’ most pressing concerns is potential retaliation, so management should make it clear that individuals will not face consequences after serving as internal whistleblowers.

To learn more about this important issue for today’s businesses and organizations, consult a knowledgeable and experienced Dallas attorney at Whistleblower Law for Managers today.

Honors
Our Office
  • Dallas Office
    4514 Cole Ave
    #600
    Dallas, Texas 75205
    Phone: 214-306-8045
    Fax: 469-729-9926
Testimonials
  • "Steve Kardell was terrific in representing me in some very adversarial discussions with Citigroup and also later represented me in my testimony before the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission."  -Richard Bowen, Citigroup Whistleblower

  • "Never thought my career would end like it did after 30 years of service. I was part of the first round of the so called reduction of force. I asked myself how can I be part of this with 30 years of seniority. How did they pick these 90 plus employees? Now, the culture of this organization made you question every decision they made. It wasn’t what you knew it’s was a culture of who you know. Nonetheless, I did not accept their severance package. I immediately starting looking for an attorney who would take on my case. After the initial call to Steve I had hope again. He was open and honest about everything and reassured me he would do his best for me, and he did. I had an awesome outcome. Thanks Steve you’re the best."  -S.S.

  • "Reaching out to Steve Kardell was the best decision I made. His ability to provide immediate insight and direction was very powerful, and a huge relief during a very stressful time period. For anyone struggling with a whistleblower situation, I would highly recommend at least speaking with Steve. After a 10 minute call with him, I had a better understanding of what I was dealing with. Even better, he gave me some immediate hope. In the end Steve did a better job than I thought was possible. Steve was able to get in contact with people in my organization, that I didn’t have access to. Because of his years of experience, he already has contacts in many organizations in Dallas. The entire situation was handled peacefully. I was impressed by his ability to “keep the peace”–rather than creating a battle with the organization. The reason I didn’t reach out to a lawyer initially, was because I thought it would mean an immediate end to any hope of a positive relationship with the company. Steve was able to address my concerns, and in the end I was able to continue to work for them."  -KS

FOLLOW US
Facebook Twitter Linkedin RSS Feed JD Supra