Search Site
Menu
Insurance Company Sued by Los Angeles Hospital Over $42 Million Whistleblower Settlement

A now-closed hospital in Los Angeles filed a lawsuit against its insurance provider, alleging a denial of coverage to the facility while the hospital was publicly criticized for alleged illegal referral agreements.

The case stems from a whistleblower lawsuit filed in 2013 by Paul Chan against Pacific Alliance Medical Center (PAMC) under the False Claims Act’s qui tam provision. Chan claimed the hospital violated state and federal false claims legislation by forming illegal referral agreements with local clinics.

In 2015, the U.S. Department of Justice subpoenaed the hospital, leading to an investigation that lasted for two years. In January 2017, the DOJ decided not to press charges against PAMC, and in June of that year the facility agreed to settle the case for $42 million.

PAMC’s current lawsuit

PAMC filed its current lawsuit on July 10, claiming the hospital’s legal entity PAMC Ltd. notified its insurer, National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh, about the subpoena and ongoing whistleblower lawsuit, doing so in April 2017. The insurer acknowledged the submission claim that same month, but denied hospital coverage for the whistleblower and subpoena the next month, claiming neither were reported to the company in a timely manner under the insurer’s policy, which meant the costs were not eligible for reimbursement.

The hospital seeks a full reimbursement for the $42 million figure. It also opposes the insurer’s position that the subpoena from the DOJ did not qualify as a “claim.” The lawsuit instead maintains the hospital was prohibited from disclosing the legal proceedings to the insurer under federal law until the gag order was lifted, upon which time it provided immediate notice to the insurer.

For further guidance related to ongoing changes in the world of whistleblower law, speak with a knowledgeable Dallas attorney at Kardell Law Group.

Honors
Our Office
  • Dallas Office
    4514 Cole Ave
    #600
    Dallas, Texas 75205
    Phone: 214-306-8045
    Fax: 469-729-9926
Testimonials
  • "Steve Kardell was terrific in representing me in some very adversarial discussions with Citigroup and also later represented me in my testimony before the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission."  -Richard Bowen, Citigroup Whistleblower

  • "Never thought my career would end like it did after 30 years of service. I was part of the first round of the so called reduction of force. I asked myself how can I be part of this with 30 years of seniority. How did they pick these 90 plus employees? Now, the culture of this organization made you question every decision they made. It wasn’t what you knew it’s was a culture of who you know. Nonetheless, I did not accept their severance package. I immediately starting looking for an attorney who would take on my case. After the initial call to Steve I had hope again. He was open and honest about everything and reassured me he would do his best for me, and he did. I had an awesome outcome. Thanks Steve you’re the best."  -S.S.

  • "Reaching out to Steve Kardell was the best decision I made. His ability to provide immediate insight and direction was very powerful, and a huge relief during a very stressful time period. For anyone struggling with a whistleblower situation, I would highly recommend at least speaking with Steve. After a 10 minute call with him, I had a better understanding of what I was dealing with. Even better, he gave me some immediate hope. In the end Steve did a better job than I thought was possible. Steve was able to get in contact with people in my organization, that I didn’t have access to. Because of his years of experience, he already has contacts in many organizations in Dallas. The entire situation was handled peacefully. I was impressed by his ability to “keep the peace”–rather than creating a battle with the organization. The reason I didn’t reach out to a lawyer initially, was because I thought it would mean an immediate end to any hope of a positive relationship with the company. Steve was able to address my concerns, and in the end I was able to continue to work for them."  -KS

FOLLOW US
Facebook Twitter Linkedin RSS Feed JD Supra