Search Site
Menu
Fourth Circuit Allows United Airlines Whistleblower Retaliation Claim to Proceed

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals recently reinstated a whistleblower claim filed by a former employee of United Airlines who claims he was fired after repeatedly issuing complaints about the company’s failure to properly conduct repairs on U.S. Air Force cargo planes.

A judge in district court had dismissed the retaliation claim, but on appeal, the Fourth Circuit allowed the retaliation claim to move forward. The higher court stated there was sufficient evidence to indicate the company did retaliate against David Grant, the whistleblower in the case.

Inaccurate paperwork at issue

Grant worked for United Airlines from 2008 to 2014 at Charleston Air Force Base in South Carolina. He served as an aviation maintenance technician tasked with maintaining engines for the local fleet of cargo planes at the base.

In the lawsuit, Grant recalls observations that some of his superiors at United Airlines “pencil-whipped” through reports that indicated maintenance work was done when it had not actually been completed. He also alleges United Airlines workers used improper tools for the repair jobs, and that some maintenance was performed by workers who did not complete the required training and eye exercises.

Grant says he was fired after complaining once again to his superiors in May 2014. He filed his claim the following February.

There are numerous federal protections for whistleblowers who go through the proper processes to report wrongdoing on the part of their employers. If you are interested in learning more about the legal options available, consult an experienced whistleblower lawyer at Kardell Law Group today.

Honors
Our Office
  • Dallas Office
    4514 Cole Ave
    #600
    Dallas, Texas 75205
    Phone: 214-306-8045
    Fax: 469-729-9926
Testimonials
  • "Steve Kardell was terrific in representing me in some very adversarial discussions with Citigroup and also later represented me in my testimony before the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission."  -Richard Bowen, Citigroup Whistleblower

  • "Never thought my career would end like it did after 30 years of service. I was part of the first round of the so called reduction of force. I asked myself how can I be part of this with 30 years of seniority. How did they pick these 90 plus employees? Now, the culture of this organization made you question every decision they made. It wasn’t what you knew it’s was a culture of who you know. Nonetheless, I did not accept their severance package. I immediately starting looking for an attorney who would take on my case. After the initial call to Steve I had hope again. He was open and honest about everything and reassured me he would do his best for me, and he did. I had an awesome outcome. Thanks Steve you’re the best."  -S.S.

  • "Reaching out to Steve Kardell was the best decision I made. His ability to provide immediate insight and direction was very powerful, and a huge relief during a very stressful time period. For anyone struggling with a whistleblower situation, I would highly recommend at least speaking with Steve. After a 10 minute call with him, I had a better understanding of what I was dealing with. Even better, he gave me some immediate hope. In the end Steve did a better job than I thought was possible. Steve was able to get in contact with people in my organization, that I didn’t have access to. Because of his years of experience, he already has contacts in many organizations in Dallas. The entire situation was handled peacefully. I was impressed by his ability to “keep the peace”–rather than creating a battle with the organization. The reason I didn’t reach out to a lawyer initially, was because I thought it would mean an immediate end to any hope of a positive relationship with the company. Steve was able to address my concerns, and in the end I was able to continue to work for them."  -KS

FOLLOW US
Facebook Twitter Linkedin RSS Feed JD Supra