Search Site
Menu
ERISA Lawsuit Filed by Former Disney Employee Dismissed

Walt Disney Co.’s 401(k) fiduciaries will not have to defend a class action lawsuit that challenged their choice to allow participants in the investment plans to invest their assets in a mutual fund that heavily invested in Valeant Pharmaceuticals International Inc. stock.

The participants’ amended lawsuit was dismissed by Judge Percy Anderson on April 21. Judge Anderson determined the participants did not point to any type of “special circumstance” that would even support an inference that the plan had any reason not to rely on the market valuation of Valeant’s stock until its price collapsed, or to stop offering the Sequoia Fund as an investment option. As of 2015, the Sequoia Fund had invested 25 percent of all its assets into Valeant stock.

This marked the second time Judge Anderson dismissed allegations by participants against Disney’s investment committee. In this most recent decision, the judge ruled that participants would not be allowed to amend their allegations again.

The allegations levied by Disney’s 401(k) participants came after Valeant Stock declined to under $70 per share by November 2015, after reaching $262 per share in August 2015. The decline followed a growth-by-acquisition strategy in which the pharmaceutical company spent more than $23 billion to purchase seven new companies from 2009 to 2015. Participants had invested 12 percent of their assets — a total of more than $500 million — in the Sequoia Fund.

What effect will the judge’s decision have?

This decision could be good news for other companies facing Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) claims related to issues with Valeant stock held in employee retirement assets. For example, DST Systems Inc. has already been sued twice in the last year for mismanaging its 401(k) plan in similar circumstances.

If you would like to learn more about the process of filing an ERISA lawsuit, consult a knowledgeable Dallas attorney with Whistleblower Law for Managers.

Honors
Our Office
  • Dallas Office
    4514 Cole Ave
    #600
    Dallas, Texas 75205
    Phone: 214-306-8045
    Fax: 469-729-9926
Testimonials
  • "Steve Kardell was terrific in representing me in some very adversarial discussions with Citigroup and also later represented me in my testimony before the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission."  -Richard Bowen, Citigroup Whistleblower

  • "Never thought my career would end like it did after 30 years of service. I was part of the first round of the so called reduction of force. I asked myself how can I be part of this with 30 years of seniority. How did they pick these 90 plus employees? Now, the culture of this organization made you question every decision they made. It wasn’t what you knew it’s was a culture of who you know. Nonetheless, I did not accept their severance package. I immediately starting looking for an attorney who would take on my case. After the initial call to Steve I had hope again. He was open and honest about everything and reassured me he would do his best for me, and he did. I had an awesome outcome. Thanks Steve you’re the best."  -S.S.

  • "Reaching out to Steve Kardell was the best decision I made. His ability to provide immediate insight and direction was very powerful, and a huge relief during a very stressful time period. For anyone struggling with a whistleblower situation, I would highly recommend at least speaking with Steve. After a 10 minute call with him, I had a better understanding of what I was dealing with. Even better, he gave me some immediate hope. In the end Steve did a better job than I thought was possible. Steve was able to get in contact with people in my organization, that I didn’t have access to. Because of his years of experience, he already has contacts in many organizations in Dallas. The entire situation was handled peacefully. I was impressed by his ability to “keep the peace”–rather than creating a battle with the organization. The reason I didn’t reach out to a lawyer initially, was because I thought it would mean an immediate end to any hope of a positive relationship with the company. Steve was able to address my concerns, and in the end I was able to continue to work for them."  -KS

FOLLOW US
Facebook Twitter Linkedin RSS Feed JD Supra