Search Site

District Court Decides to Reject SOX Claim on Several Grounds

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois issued a ruling in Hill v. Komatsu America Corp. that involved the dismissal of a Sarbanes-Oxley Act retaliation claim on summary judgment on multiple grounds.

The plaintiff in the case raised concerns to the CEO of the Komatsu America Corp. that the company’s repair and maintenance program it was offering to distributors and product end users was not sufficiently funded. Within about a month, the plaintiff was fired after an unrelated investigation over improper expense reporting and for bringing his wife along on company business without first getting approval to do so.

The plaintiff filed a wrongful termination lawsuit, but the court granted Komatsu America Corp’s motion to dismiss on four separate grounds:

  • The court determined that a concern of low funds in the repair and maintenance reserve was not the same action as a suggestion of securities fraud, and that the plaintiff did not suggest the state of those funds was being misrepresented to shareholders.
  • The defendant was not aware the plaintiff was engaging in a protected activity because he had not previously reported there was any illegal action taking place in the company.
  • The plaintiff did not demonstrate that his expression of concern about the state of the funds was somehow related to his termination.
  • Even if the plaintiff had established proof of this concern being related to his termination, he still would have been terminated in the absence of protected activity because of his violations of the company’s expense and travel policy.

For more information and guidance on handling whistleblower claims within your business or organization, speak with a dedicated attorney at Whistleblower Law for Managers in Dallas, Texas.

Awards & Honors
Our Office
  • Dallas Office
    4514 Cole Ave
    Dallas, Texas 75205
    Phone: 214-306-8045
    Fax: 469-729-9926
As Seen In
In his new book, "Standing Up to China: How a Whistleblower Risked Everything for His Country," former client & Author, Ashley Yablon, quotes Attorney Steve Kardell about Whistelblower Law.
  • "Steve Kardell was terrific in representing me in some very adversarial discussions with Citigroup and also later represented me in my testimony before the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission."  -Richard Bowen, Citigroup Whistleblower

  • "Incredible knowledge of employee related concerns and equally brilliant knowledge of health care regulations, standards of practice. I would recommend this firm to anyone."  -V.B.

  • "Reaching out to Steve Kardell was the best decision I made. His ability to provide immediate insight and direction was very powerful, and a huge relief during a very stressful time period. For anyone struggling with a whistleblower situation, I would highly recommend at least speaking with Steve. After a 10 minute call with him, I had a better understanding of what I was dealing with. Even better, he gave me some immediate hope. In the end Steve did a better job than I thought was possible. Steve was able to get in contact with people in my organization, that I didn’t have access to. Because of his years of experience, he already has contacts in many organizations in Dallas. The entire situation was handled peacefully. I was impressed by his ability to “keep the peace”–rather than creating a battle with the organization. The reason I didn’t reach out to a lawyer initially, was because I thought it would mean an immediate end to any hope of a positive relationship with the company. Steve was able to address my concerns, and in the end I was able to continue to work for them."  -KS

  • "Never thought my career would end like it did after 30 years of service. I was part of the first round of the so called reduction of force. I asked myself how can I be part of this with 30 years of seniority. How did they pick these 90 plus employees? Now, the culture of this organization made you question every decision they made. It wasn’t what you knew it’s was a culture of who you know. Nonetheless, I did not accept their severance package. I immediately starting looking for an attorney who would take on my case. After the initial call to Steve I had hope again. He was open and honest about everything and reassured me he would do his best for me, and he did. I had an awesome outcome. Thanks Steve you’re the best."  -S.S.