Search Site
Menu
Banc of California Whistleblower’s Salacious Allegations Made Public

According to a recently filed whistleblower lawsuit, Banc of California Inc., which is under investigation by federal regulators after being linked to a con man’s illegal activity, allegedly inflated its profits while ignoring a top executive in the corporation using company money to pay for strippers.

According to the lawsuit, a decision by company management to reverse accrued bonuses of company employees resulted in Banc of California improperly carrying over revenues earned in 2016, which made it look more profitable in 2017 than it actually was.

The whistleblower is Heather Endresen, who worked as a managing director for the Small Business Administration loan program at the bank. She claims to have been wrongfully terminated after raising complaints about the bonus pool shifting and the behavior of ex-CFO Francisco Turner, the man who allegedly used company money to pay for strippers and had sex with employees in his office. According to Endresen, Turner also used drugs and routinely pressured employees to participate with him.

Turner denies the allegations. Endresen says she was told by the bank’s legal team that there was no company policy against sexual activity in the workplace or using corporate money to pay for strippers.

Legal difficulties

This is not the first time Banc of California has landed in the legal spotlight for the wrong reasons. In October 2016, an anonymous short seller wrote and published a report in which they alleged ties between executives at the firm and Jason Galanis, an imprisoned con man and former financier.

The firm is also embroiled in another whistleblower lawsuit filed this past August by a former vice president who alleges he and other employees were terminated after raising concerns about the conduct of bank directors and officers.

To learn more about your legal options if you believe you’ve been wrongfully terminated, consult a knowledgeable Dallas whistleblower attorney at Whistleblower Law for Managers.

Honors
Our Office
  • Dallas Office
    4514 Cole Ave
    #600
    Dallas, Texas 75205
    Phone: 214-306-8045
    Fax: 469-729-9926
Testimonials
  • "Steve Kardell was terrific in representing me in some very adversarial discussions with Citigroup and also later represented me in my testimony before the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission."  -Richard Bowen, Citigroup Whistleblower

  • "Never thought my career would end like it did after 30 years of service. I was part of the first round of the so called reduction of force. I asked myself how can I be part of this with 30 years of seniority. How did they pick these 90 plus employees? Now, the culture of this organization made you question every decision they made. It wasn’t what you knew it’s was a culture of who you know. Nonetheless, I did not accept their severance package. I immediately starting looking for an attorney who would take on my case. After the initial call to Steve I had hope again. He was open and honest about everything and reassured me he would do his best for me, and he did. I had an awesome outcome. Thanks Steve you’re the best."  -S.S.

  • "Reaching out to Steve Kardell was the best decision I made. His ability to provide immediate insight and direction was very powerful, and a huge relief during a very stressful time period. For anyone struggling with a whistleblower situation, I would highly recommend at least speaking with Steve. After a 10 minute call with him, I had a better understanding of what I was dealing with. Even better, he gave me some immediate hope. In the end Steve did a better job than I thought was possible. Steve was able to get in contact with people in my organization, that I didn’t have access to. Because of his years of experience, he already has contacts in many organizations in Dallas. The entire situation was handled peacefully. I was impressed by his ability to “keep the peace”–rather than creating a battle with the organization. The reason I didn’t reach out to a lawyer initially, was because I thought it would mean an immediate end to any hope of a positive relationship with the company. Steve was able to address my concerns, and in the end I was able to continue to work for them."  -KS

FOLLOW US
Facebook Twitter Linkedin RSS Feed JD Supra