Search Site
Menu
Will the Whistleblowing Last in Benghazi?

On September 11, 2012, a heavily armed group blitzed the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya.  An additional armed assault targeted a nearby CIA annex, killing four people, including U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens. U.S. government employees are blowing the whistle on how the government responded the night of the attack and in the weeks following the attack.

U.S. Whistleblowing Law

A whistleblower is a person who reports wrongdoing in an organization, company or government agency.  The wrongdoing may be a violation of law, transgression of regulation, corruption, fraud, or health and safety violations. Whistleblowers often fear reprisals from the agency or company such as demotion, termination or pay reduction.

To protect federal whistleblowers, the U.S. enacted the Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989.  A federal agency contravenes the Act if it retaliates against any employee or applicant because the employee or applicant disclosed information that they reasonably believed was:

·            A violation of regulation, law or rule

·            A grievous mismanagement

·            A huge waste of money

·            An abuse of authority

·            A major danger to public health or safety

 

 

Blowing the whistle on what occurred on the night of the Benghazi Attack

Gregory Hicks, top deputy to U.S ambassador to Libya, Chris Stevens, testified on what occurred the night of the attack in Benghazi.  He revealed two important points:

·            A second team of special-operations forces were told not to fly to Benghazi on the night of the attack

·            After pleading with the embassy’s Defense attaché to send F-15 fighter jets to Benghazi, Hicks was told that the closest jets were three hours away at a base that had no refueling options

Hicks’ testimony contradicted the testimony and briefings that senior White House administration officials gave to Congress in November of 2012.

Whistleblowing on White House’s Benghazi talking points

After the Benghazi attack occurred, U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice publicly said that the attack was caused by a protest over an anti-Islam film. When Hicks testified to Congress, he insisted that Rice’s mischaracterization of the attacked angered Libyan President Magariaf and caused the FBI team to be retained in Tripoli for 17–18 days.

Benghazi whistleblower faces retaliation

During his testimony at Congressional hearing, Hicks detailed the retaliatory treatment he suffered because of his whistleblowing. He reported that Hillary Clinton’s chief of staff called him to say how upset she was that Hicks met with investigators looking into Benghazi after being told not to do it.  Hicks also discussed that he challenged superiors on why Rice incorrectly described the attack as a reaction to an anti-Islamic video.

State department demoted Hicks from being deputy chief of mission to desk officer shortly thereafter.

The whistleblowing lasts

Mahatma Gandhi declared, “Truth stands, even if there be no public support. It is self-sustained.” With Hicks revealing accurate, eyewitness details of the misconduct during and after the Benghazi attack, the Benghazi whistleblowing will prosper. If you have questions about misconduct that you witnessed at your place of employment, it is important to discuss it with a Texas whistleblower attorney today.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Honors
Our Office
  • Dallas Office
    4514 Cole Ave
    #600
    Dallas, Texas 75205
    Phone: 214-306-8045
    Fax: 469-729-9926
Testimonials
  • "Steve Kardell was terrific in representing me in some very adversarial discussions with Citigroup and also later represented me in my testimony before the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission."  -Richard Bowen, Citigroup Whistleblower

  • "Incredible knowledge of employee related concerns and equally brilliant knowledge of health care regulations, standards of practice. I would recommend this firm to anyone."  -V.B.

  • "Reaching out to Steve Kardell was the best decision I made. His ability to provide immediate insight and direction was very powerful, and a huge relief during a very stressful time period. For anyone struggling with a whistleblower situation, I would highly recommend at least speaking with Steve. After a 10 minute call with him, I had a better understanding of what I was dealing with. Even better, he gave me some immediate hope. In the end Steve did a better job than I thought was possible. Steve was able to get in contact with people in my organization, that I didn’t have access to. Because of his years of experience, he already has contacts in many organizations in Dallas. The entire situation was handled peacefully. I was impressed by his ability to “keep the peace”–rather than creating a battle with the organization. The reason I didn’t reach out to a lawyer initially, was because I thought it would mean an immediate end to any hope of a positive relationship with the company. Steve was able to address my concerns, and in the end I was able to continue to work for them."  -KS

  • "Never thought my career would end like it did after 30 years of service. I was part of the first round of the so called reduction of force. I asked myself how can I be part of this with 30 years of seniority. How did they pick these 90 plus employees? Now, the culture of this organization made you question every decision they made. It wasn’t what you knew it’s was a culture of who you know. Nonetheless, I did not accept their severance package. I immediately starting looking for an attorney who would take on my case. After the initial call to Steve I had hope again. He was open and honest about everything and reassured me he would do his best for me, and he did. I had an awesome outcome. Thanks Steve you’re the best."  -S.S.

FOLLOW US
Facebook Twitter Linkedin RSS Feed JD Supra