Search Site

Whistleblower Suit Filed Against Texas Railroad Commission

Frederick Wright recently sued the Texas Railroad Commission for terminating his employment in violation of state whistleblower laws. If the suit is not settled, it could attract considerable attention in Texas.

Wright was on the fast track

Wright was a petroleum engineer who worked at the Bureau of Land Management and as an engineer in oil and gas fields before joining the Railroad Commission of Texas in 2007 as an engineering specialist. He quickly advanced, receiving two promotions in four years. At the end of 2012, the Railroad Commission gave him a merit bonus. Wright’s employment file was squeaky clean.

Prepare the whistle

In February 2013, the Houston district director asked Wright to approve completion reports on oil and gas wells that were not in compliance with certain rules. Wright avoided a conflict by convincing the operator to modify the wells in exchange for an approval.

Shortly thereafter, the director asked Wright to approve additional reports on wells that were not in compliance with rules and regulations, Wright filed a complaint with agency directors. Immediately, Wright’s superiors disciplined him for allegedly not relating well with operators. A month later, the Railroad Commission fired Wright. Two disciplinary complaints that were attached to Wright’s employment record were given to Wright. The complaints were from operators who said that Wright was demanded strict compliance with rules and regulations.

The arguments

The Texas Railroad Commission argues that it terminated Wright because of documented complaints about his performance. Wright insists that the agency’s stated reasons are simply pretext for its retaliation of his whistleblowing.

The law in Texas

The Texas Whistleblower Act prohibits government employers’ retaliating against a public employee who in good faith informed an appropriate law enforcement authority of a violation of law by the employing governmental entity or another public employee. The whistleblower who suffered retaliation may be entitled to injunctive and compensatory relief.

As the story of Wright’s lawsuit against the Texas Railroad Commission unfolds, the question of whether Wright reported his employer’s malfeasance to an appropriate law enforcement authority may be an issue to cause his suit to be dismissed. Employing an experienced Dallas whistleblower attorney is important because he understands how to meet the whistleblower laws’ requirements.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Awards & Honors
Our Office
  • Dallas Office
    4514 Cole Ave
    Dallas, Texas 75205
    Phone: 214-306-8045
    Fax: 469-729-9926
As Seen In
In his new book, "Standing Up to China: How a Whistleblower Risked Everything for His Country," former client & Author, Ashley Yablon, quotes Attorney Steve Kardell about Whistelblower Law.
  • "Steve Kardell was terrific in representing me in some very adversarial discussions with Citigroup and also later represented me in my testimony before the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission."  -Richard Bowen, Citigroup Whistleblower

  • "Incredible knowledge of employee related concerns and equally brilliant knowledge of health care regulations, standards of practice. I would recommend this firm to anyone."  -V.B.

  • "Reaching out to Steve Kardell was the best decision I made. His ability to provide immediate insight and direction was very powerful, and a huge relief during a very stressful time period. For anyone struggling with a whistleblower situation, I would highly recommend at least speaking with Steve. After a 10 minute call with him, I had a better understanding of what I was dealing with. Even better, he gave me some immediate hope. In the end Steve did a better job than I thought was possible. Steve was able to get in contact with people in my organization, that I didn’t have access to. Because of his years of experience, he already has contacts in many organizations in Dallas. The entire situation was handled peacefully. I was impressed by his ability to “keep the peace”–rather than creating a battle with the organization. The reason I didn’t reach out to a lawyer initially, was because I thought it would mean an immediate end to any hope of a positive relationship with the company. Steve was able to address my concerns, and in the end I was able to continue to work for them."  -KS

  • "Never thought my career would end like it did after 30 years of service. I was part of the first round of the so called reduction of force. I asked myself how can I be part of this with 30 years of seniority. How did they pick these 90 plus employees? Now, the culture of this organization made you question every decision they made. It wasn’t what you knew it’s was a culture of who you know. Nonetheless, I did not accept their severance package. I immediately starting looking for an attorney who would take on my case. After the initial call to Steve I had hope again. He was open and honest about everything and reassured me he would do his best for me, and he did. I had an awesome outcome. Thanks Steve you’re the best."  -S.S.