Search Site

Wells Fargo Scandal Could Lead to Major Whistleblower Liability for Businesses

Charlotte, North Carolina skylineAmericans have been shocked by news reports about false accounts at Wells Fargo Bank, which led to $185 million in fines and the firing of 5,300 employees. With such widespread misconduct, it is natural to ask whether workers attempted to report the illegal behavior to supervisors. Many former employees have come forward to declare that they tried to stop the misconduct but experienced unlawful retaliation for their whistleblowing. These allegations could lead to a new wave of legal problems for Wells Fargo.

Whether your business is large or small, managers and other company authorities must remain vigilant and take special care to avert whistleblower problems.  Several circumstances can trigger an increased risk of liability, including:

  • Institutionalized misconduct — When certain types of misbehavior become standard practice, it can be easy to overlook potential whistleblower liability. Rather than identifying employees as a retaliation risk, supervisors might convince themselves that employees who speak up about misconduct don’t “fit in” with the company’s culture. Each action taken against an employee should be evaluated on its own merits.
  • Pretenses for firing or other retaliation — Listing a different justification for disciplining or terminating an employee is not a safeguard against a retaliation claim. Without proper documentation, these purported grounds might not withstand scrutiny, especially in a high-profile matter. The Wells Fargo whistleblower who was fired for “tardiness” shortly after identifying corporate malfeasance might have a compelling claim in light of recent revelations.
  • Misplaced reliance on whistleblower protection policies — Executives and managers cannot assume that decisions made by subordinates automatically adhere to company whistleblower protection policies. Strong internal policies are a good first step, but verification is necessary to avert potential liability.

The number of Wells Fargo employees who might have a whistleblower claim means that the eventual resolution could be very costly. For many companies, even one retaliation lawsuit can result in significant damages.

If your company is the target of a retaliation complaint or if you are interested in ways to guard against potential whistleblower liability, a knowledgeable Dallas attorney with Whistleblower Law for Managers can evaluate your situation.

Awards & Honors
Our Office
  • Dallas Office
    4514 Cole Ave
    Dallas, Texas 75205
    Phone: 214-306-8045
    Fax: 469-729-9926
As Seen In
In his new book, "Standing Up to China: How a Whistleblower Risked Everything for His Country," former client & Author, Ashley Yablon, quotes Attorney Steve Kardell about Whistelblower Law.
  • "Steve Kardell was terrific in representing me in some very adversarial discussions with Citigroup and also later represented me in my testimony before the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission."  -Richard Bowen, Citigroup Whistleblower

  • "Incredible knowledge of employee related concerns and equally brilliant knowledge of health care regulations, standards of practice. I would recommend this firm to anyone."  -V.B.

  • "Reaching out to Steve Kardell was the best decision I made. His ability to provide immediate insight and direction was very powerful, and a huge relief during a very stressful time period. For anyone struggling with a whistleblower situation, I would highly recommend at least speaking with Steve. After a 10 minute call with him, I had a better understanding of what I was dealing with. Even better, he gave me some immediate hope. In the end Steve did a better job than I thought was possible. Steve was able to get in contact with people in my organization, that I didn’t have access to. Because of his years of experience, he already has contacts in many organizations in Dallas. The entire situation was handled peacefully. I was impressed by his ability to “keep the peace”–rather than creating a battle with the organization. The reason I didn’t reach out to a lawyer initially, was because I thought it would mean an immediate end to any hope of a positive relationship with the company. Steve was able to address my concerns, and in the end I was able to continue to work for them."  -KS

  • "Never thought my career would end like it did after 30 years of service. I was part of the first round of the so called reduction of force. I asked myself how can I be part of this with 30 years of seniority. How did they pick these 90 plus employees? Now, the culture of this organization made you question every decision they made. It wasn’t what you knew it’s was a culture of who you know. Nonetheless, I did not accept their severance package. I immediately starting looking for an attorney who would take on my case. After the initial call to Steve I had hope again. He was open and honest about everything and reassured me he would do his best for me, and he did. I had an awesome outcome. Thanks Steve you’re the best."  -S.S.