Search Site

Was Richard Bowen’s Whistle Stuffed?

Five years have passed since Lehman Brothers’ bankruptcy. Richard M. Bowen III, a former Citigroup executive who blew the whistle on their bad business practices, provided 1000 pages of documents to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and 28 pages of testimony to the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission (FCIC). Nevertheless, Bowen’s voice has not been heard because of alleged cover-up and censorship.

The facts according to Bowen

Bowen described how Citigroup was purchasing tens of billions of dollars in risky mortgages, repackaging them and selling them as investments. Attempting to be a team player, Bowen sent an email in November 2007 to Citigroup executives notifying them of internal breakdowns and possible financial losses. He received a response from a Citigroup attorney telling him that they will respond to his allegations and that there is no need to continue corresponding. Bowen sent additional emails to the attorney and never heard an answer. In 2008, Bowen’s role was significantly downsized. In January 2009, Citigroup officially terminated its relationship with Bowen.

Whistleblowing to the SEC

After Bowen’s responsibilities were reduced in 2008, he decided to blow the whistle on Citigroup to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. The complaint was settled as part of his separation agreement with Citigroup.

Meanwhile, in July, Bowen went to the Securities and Exchange Commission to testify about Citigroup’s dangerous business practices. After handing over more than 1,000 pages of documents, Bowen never heard a response from the SEC.

The deafening sound of silence

After testifying to the SEC and giving them 1000 pages of supporting documents, Bowen received the response that they would pursue his claim. Not only did the SEC not do anything, but they locked up his file. Repeated requests under the Freedom of Information Act for access to his file have been denied.

In May 2009, Congress created the 10-member FCIC to analyze the causes of the U.S. financial crisis. Bowen, upon invitation, addressed the committee and told them his story. One week after giving 28 pages of testimony, one of Bowen’s attorneys was informed by the FCIC that they want Bowen to make substantial changes to his testimony. They warned that if alterations are not made, Citi will make war with him and the FCIC. After contemplating the situation, Bowen made the recommended changes to his testimony.

Members of the FCIC have subsequently denied applying any pressure on Bowen to change his testimony.

Blowing the whistle on any company’s malfeasance is a dangerous task that often involves retaliation by the employer. An experienced Dallas whistleblowing attorney can guide you through the entire process to protect your interests.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Awards & Honors
Our Office
  • Dallas Office
    4514 Cole Ave
    Dallas, Texas 75205
    Phone: 214-306-8045
    Fax: 469-729-9926
As Seen In
In his new book, "Standing Up to China: How a Whistleblower Risked Everything for His Country," former client & Author, Ashley Yablon, quotes Attorney Steve Kardell about Whistelblower Law.
  • "Steve Kardell was terrific in representing me in some very adversarial discussions with Citigroup and also later represented me in my testimony before the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission."  -Richard Bowen, Citigroup Whistleblower

  • "Incredible knowledge of employee related concerns and equally brilliant knowledge of health care regulations, standards of practice. I would recommend this firm to anyone."  -V.B.

  • "Reaching out to Steve Kardell was the best decision I made. His ability to provide immediate insight and direction was very powerful, and a huge relief during a very stressful time period. For anyone struggling with a whistleblower situation, I would highly recommend at least speaking with Steve. After a 10 minute call with him, I had a better understanding of what I was dealing with. Even better, he gave me some immediate hope. In the end Steve did a better job than I thought was possible. Steve was able to get in contact with people in my organization, that I didn’t have access to. Because of his years of experience, he already has contacts in many organizations in Dallas. The entire situation was handled peacefully. I was impressed by his ability to “keep the peace”–rather than creating a battle with the organization. The reason I didn’t reach out to a lawyer initially, was because I thought it would mean an immediate end to any hope of a positive relationship with the company. Steve was able to address my concerns, and in the end I was able to continue to work for them."  -KS

  • "Never thought my career would end like it did after 30 years of service. I was part of the first round of the so called reduction of force. I asked myself how can I be part of this with 30 years of seniority. How did they pick these 90 plus employees? Now, the culture of this organization made you question every decision they made. It wasn’t what you knew it’s was a culture of who you know. Nonetheless, I did not accept their severance package. I immediately starting looking for an attorney who would take on my case. After the initial call to Steve I had hope again. He was open and honest about everything and reassured me he would do his best for me, and he did. I had an awesome outcome. Thanks Steve you’re the best."  -S.S.