Search Site

Understanding FMLA Interference Claims

The Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) gives eligible employees the right to take 12 weeks of job-protected leave from work due to a personal or family medical need, or for the birth or adoption of a child. Employees must be notified of their rights and prevents the employer from interfering with, limiting or denying FMLA rights. An interference claim arises when an employer runs afoul of the law’s provisions.

Here’s what you need to know about FMLA interference claims.

Elements of an FMLA interference claim

To prevail on an FMLA interference claim, the employee must show:

  1. The employee was eligible for FMLA protections,
  2. The employer was covered by the FMLA,
  3. The employee was entitled to take FMLA leave,
  4. The employee provided sufficient notice of intent to take leave,
  5. The employer interfered with, restrained or denied FMLA benefits, and
  6. The employee was prejudiced by the employer’s actions.

Asking for FMLA leave

Generally, there are no “magic words” that must be used to take FMLA leave. However, the employee must provide their employer with sufficient information to understand that the requested leave falls under a qualifying reason. For example, if an employee meets with their employer and asks for information about medical leave, this likely qualifies as an attempt to exercise benefits—even if they don’t mention the FMLA by name.

Is it legal for HR to discourage employees from using FMLA leave?

Employers cannot discourage employees from attempting to exercise their rights under the FMLA. They are not allowed to impede access to FMLA benefits, whether by “subterfuge, concealment or intimidation.” Interference or restraint alone can establish a violation.

If you’ve experienced FMLA interference, a seasoned Kardell Law Group whistleblower attorney can help. Call our office today to schedule a consultation.

Awards & Honors
Our Office
  • Dallas Office
    4514 Cole Ave
    Dallas, Texas 75205
    Phone: 214-306-8045
    Fax: 469-729-9926
As Seen In
In his new book, "Standing Up to China: How a Whistleblower Risked Everything for His Country," former client & Author, Ashley Yablon, quotes Attorney Steve Kardell about Whistelblower Law.
  • "Steve Kardell was terrific in representing me in some very adversarial discussions with Citigroup and also later represented me in my testimony before the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission."  -Richard Bowen, Citigroup Whistleblower

  • "Incredible knowledge of employee related concerns and equally brilliant knowledge of health care regulations, standards of practice. I would recommend this firm to anyone."  -V.B.

  • "Reaching out to Steve Kardell was the best decision I made. His ability to provide immediate insight and direction was very powerful, and a huge relief during a very stressful time period. For anyone struggling with a whistleblower situation, I would highly recommend at least speaking with Steve. After a 10 minute call with him, I had a better understanding of what I was dealing with. Even better, he gave me some immediate hope. In the end Steve did a better job than I thought was possible. Steve was able to get in contact with people in my organization, that I didn’t have access to. Because of his years of experience, he already has contacts in many organizations in Dallas. The entire situation was handled peacefully. I was impressed by his ability to “keep the peace”–rather than creating a battle with the organization. The reason I didn’t reach out to a lawyer initially, was because I thought it would mean an immediate end to any hope of a positive relationship with the company. Steve was able to address my concerns, and in the end I was able to continue to work for them."  -KS

  • "Never thought my career would end like it did after 30 years of service. I was part of the first round of the so called reduction of force. I asked myself how can I be part of this with 30 years of seniority. How did they pick these 90 plus employees? Now, the culture of this organization made you question every decision they made. It wasn’t what you knew it’s was a culture of who you know. Nonetheless, I did not accept their severance package. I immediately starting looking for an attorney who would take on my case. After the initial call to Steve I had hope again. He was open and honest about everything and reassured me he would do his best for me, and he did. I had an awesome outcome. Thanks Steve you’re the best."  -S.S.