Search Site
Menu
Supreme Court Extends SOX Whistleblower Protection to Contractors

The Reverend Martin Luther King, Jr. once said, “Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that.” Following a rash of financial calamities largely caused by risky and illegal conduct within publicly traded companies, Congress enacted the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) to shine light into corporate boardrooms and corridors and protect the employees of publicly-traded companies from retaliation for reporting illegal activities. In the twelve years since SOX became law, corporations have invariably found ways to circumvent its scope, forcing the courts into a game of legal whack-a-mole as new loopholes are discovered and exploited. In March of 2014, the Supreme Court once again brought down the mallet.

SOX, fairly straightforward in its language regarding whistleblower protection, prohibits public companies as well as the officers, employees, contractors and agents of such companies from engaging in retaliatory conduct against whistleblowers. In Lawson v. FMR, LLC, the question before the court was whether these prohibitions extended to the employees of private companies while performing contracted work for publicly-traded companies. The Court held that it did, closing yet another loophole that allowed public companies to escape the strictures of SOX:

  • Writing for the majority, Justice Ginsberg, joined by Justices Roberts, Breyer and Kagan, found that the legislative record suggested Congress had intended for SOX to extend to privately-held contractors who provide services to publicly-traded companies.
  • Justices Scalia and Thomas concurred in the result but reached their conclusions based solely on the language and context of the applicable statutes.
  • Justice Sotomayor, joined by Justices Kennedy and Alito, dissented, finding that the majority’s interpretation would grant the Act an impossible scope, potentially allowing “a babysitter to bring a federal case [under SOX] against his employer — a parent who happens to work at Walmart . . .”

This new precedent significantly increases the reach of Sarbanes-Oxley and now allows whistleblower attorneys to assert claims on behalf of employees of certain privately-held businesses.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Honors
Our Office
  • Dallas Office
    4514 Cole Ave
    #600
    Dallas, Texas 75205
    Phone: 214-306-8045
    Fax: 469-729-9926
Testimonials
  • "Steve Kardell was terrific in representing me in some very adversarial discussions with Citigroup and also later represented me in my testimony before the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission."  -Richard Bowen, Citigroup Whistleblower

  • "Incredible knowledge of employee related concerns and equally brilliant knowledge of health care regulations, standards of practice. I would recommend this firm to anyone."  -V.B.

  • "Reaching out to Steve Kardell was the best decision I made. His ability to provide immediate insight and direction was very powerful, and a huge relief during a very stressful time period. For anyone struggling with a whistleblower situation, I would highly recommend at least speaking with Steve. After a 10 minute call with him, I had a better understanding of what I was dealing with. Even better, he gave me some immediate hope. In the end Steve did a better job than I thought was possible. Steve was able to get in contact with people in my organization, that I didn’t have access to. Because of his years of experience, he already has contacts in many organizations in Dallas. The entire situation was handled peacefully. I was impressed by his ability to “keep the peace”–rather than creating a battle with the organization. The reason I didn’t reach out to a lawyer initially, was because I thought it would mean an immediate end to any hope of a positive relationship with the company. Steve was able to address my concerns, and in the end I was able to continue to work for them."  -KS

  • "Never thought my career would end like it did after 30 years of service. I was part of the first round of the so called reduction of force. I asked myself how can I be part of this with 30 years of seniority. How did they pick these 90 plus employees? Now, the culture of this organization made you question every decision they made. It wasn’t what you knew it’s was a culture of who you know. Nonetheless, I did not accept their severance package. I immediately starting looking for an attorney who would take on my case. After the initial call to Steve I had hope again. He was open and honest about everything and reassured me he would do his best for me, and he did. I had an awesome outcome. Thanks Steve you’re the best."  -S.S.

FOLLOW US
Facebook Twitter Linkedin RSS Feed JD Supra