Search Site

Second Circuit Court Lowers Bar for Causation in FMLA Retaliation Cases

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit recently determined that for an employee to be able to advance a viable retaliation claim under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), he or she only needs to demonstrate that exercising his or her rights under the act (such as taking protected leave) was viewed as a negative factor by the employer and thusly connected to an adverse employment action.

The Second Circuit calls this a “motivating factor” or “mixed motive standard,” which is a lower burden of proof than the “but for” standard that was usually applied to retaliation claims. This lower burden of proof could well result in more FMLA retaliation claims avoiding summary judgment in Connecticut, New York and Vermont, where the Second Circuit has jurisdiction.

Changing standards

The previous “but for” standard arose out of Woods v. Start Treatment & Recovery Centers, Inc., in which the plaintiff was a substance abuse counselor at a nonprofit drug treatment facility. She had a well-documented record of poor performance, but also of taking FMLA leave for anemia treatment.

After she was terminated for poor performance, she filed a lawsuit stating it was retaliation or her taking FMLA leave. Her employer argued the plaintiff had to show the exercise of her FMLA rights was the “but for” cause of her discharge, in that she would not have been fired “but for” taking FMLA leave. The employer ultimately won the case.

In this appeal, the Second Circuit agreed instead with the employee, finding she needed only to show taking FMLA leave was a “motivating factor” in her discharge. The court said the statutory language of the FMLA did not contain a causation standard, which meant courts should defer to the Department of Labor’s interpretation, which provides that FMLA leave cannot be used as a “negative factor” in deciding whether to fire an employee.

For more information on the affect this case could have and what your next steps should be if you were the victim of employer retaliation, meet with an experienced Dallas attorney at Whistleblower Law for Managers.

Awards & Honors
Our Office
  • Dallas Office
    4514 Cole Ave
    Dallas, Texas 75205
    Phone: 214-306-8045
    Fax: 469-729-9926
As Seen In
In his new book, "Standing Up to China: How a Whistleblower Risked Everything for His Country," former client & Author, Ashley Yablon, quotes Attorney Steve Kardell about Whistelblower Law.
  • "Steve Kardell was terrific in representing me in some very adversarial discussions with Citigroup and also later represented me in my testimony before the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission."  -Richard Bowen, Citigroup Whistleblower

  • "Incredible knowledge of employee related concerns and equally brilliant knowledge of health care regulations, standards of practice. I would recommend this firm to anyone."  -V.B.

  • "Reaching out to Steve Kardell was the best decision I made. His ability to provide immediate insight and direction was very powerful, and a huge relief during a very stressful time period. For anyone struggling with a whistleblower situation, I would highly recommend at least speaking with Steve. After a 10 minute call with him, I had a better understanding of what I was dealing with. Even better, he gave me some immediate hope. In the end Steve did a better job than I thought was possible. Steve was able to get in contact with people in my organization, that I didn’t have access to. Because of his years of experience, he already has contacts in many organizations in Dallas. The entire situation was handled peacefully. I was impressed by his ability to “keep the peace”–rather than creating a battle with the organization. The reason I didn’t reach out to a lawyer initially, was because I thought it would mean an immediate end to any hope of a positive relationship with the company. Steve was able to address my concerns, and in the end I was able to continue to work for them."  -KS

  • "Never thought my career would end like it did after 30 years of service. I was part of the first round of the so called reduction of force. I asked myself how can I be part of this with 30 years of seniority. How did they pick these 90 plus employees? Now, the culture of this organization made you question every decision they made. It wasn’t what you knew it’s was a culture of who you know. Nonetheless, I did not accept their severance package. I immediately starting looking for an attorney who would take on my case. After the initial call to Steve I had hope again. He was open and honest about everything and reassured me he would do his best for me, and he did. I had an awesome outcome. Thanks Steve you’re the best."  -S.S.