Search Site

Retaliating Against a Nuclear Power Whistleblower

From the recent reports of retaliatory acts against whistleblowers, some wonder if the protections under the Dodd-Frank Act proscribing retribution against tipsters are known to companies and government offices. Regardless of whether a company committed fraud or other illegal acts, punishing employees who reported their suspicions is illegal. We will examine two whistleblowers who put their jobs on the line to report illegal activity. 

Blowing the whistle on Ramapo, New York 

For more than 10 years, Melissa Reimer served the town of Ramapo, New York as supervisor of fiscal services. She recently testified that she reported to her managers that the revenue figures used on a financial statement needed for a bond application were inaccurate. She also informed superiors of improper money transfers — including one to the town supervisor. For her whistleblowing, Reimer was directed to be quiet and was later fired. The town denied the fraud and her alleged reports of impropriety. Recently, a town hearing officer upheld two misconduct charges against Reimer and five other employees. One of the charges is that Reimer attempted to falsify records of a police officer. The hearing officer concluded that Reimer’s claim of retaliation is meritless. 

Indian Point Nuclear Power Plant 

Thirty-eight year old Jason Hettler was a lieutenant security officer at the Indian Point Nuclear Power Plant in Buchanan, New York. He alleges that he periodically reported security concerns to upper management. Court documents reveal that he informed supervisors about three failed security drills. In the most recent of these drills, security team’s radio system was hacked and communication was suspended. 

Entergy, the power plant’s parent company, modified Hettler’s work schedule and eventually suspended him. Hettler raised his concerns to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission which has led to the filing a 76-page lawsuit claiming retaliation after he blew the whistle on the plant’s security failures. 

Despite news reports of whistleblowing, many companies’ first reaction to employees reporting misconduct or illegal activity is to demote or terminate them. Corporations would be wise to educate their management about whistleblowing laws such as the Dodd-Frank Act.

For more information about availing yourself of the various whistleblowing laws, schedule an appointment with a Dallas whistleblowing lawyer

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Awards & Honors
Our Office
  • Dallas Office
    4514 Cole Ave
    Dallas, Texas 75205
    Phone: 214-306-8045
    Fax: 469-729-9926
As Seen In
In his new book, "Standing Up to China: How a Whistleblower Risked Everything for His Country," former client & Author, Ashley Yablon, quotes Attorney Steve Kardell about Whistelblower Law.
  • "Steve Kardell was terrific in representing me in some very adversarial discussions with Citigroup and also later represented me in my testimony before the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission."  -Richard Bowen, Citigroup Whistleblower

  • "Incredible knowledge of employee related concerns and equally brilliant knowledge of health care regulations, standards of practice. I would recommend this firm to anyone."  -V.B.

  • "Reaching out to Steve Kardell was the best decision I made. His ability to provide immediate insight and direction was very powerful, and a huge relief during a very stressful time period. For anyone struggling with a whistleblower situation, I would highly recommend at least speaking with Steve. After a 10 minute call with him, I had a better understanding of what I was dealing with. Even better, he gave me some immediate hope. In the end Steve did a better job than I thought was possible. Steve was able to get in contact with people in my organization, that I didn’t have access to. Because of his years of experience, he already has contacts in many organizations in Dallas. The entire situation was handled peacefully. I was impressed by his ability to “keep the peace”–rather than creating a battle with the organization. The reason I didn’t reach out to a lawyer initially, was because I thought it would mean an immediate end to any hope of a positive relationship with the company. Steve was able to address my concerns, and in the end I was able to continue to work for them."  -KS

  • "Never thought my career would end like it did after 30 years of service. I was part of the first round of the so called reduction of force. I asked myself how can I be part of this with 30 years of seniority. How did they pick these 90 plus employees? Now, the culture of this organization made you question every decision they made. It wasn’t what you knew it’s was a culture of who you know. Nonetheless, I did not accept their severance package. I immediately starting looking for an attorney who would take on my case. After the initial call to Steve I had hope again. He was open and honest about everything and reassured me he would do his best for me, and he did. I had an awesome outcome. Thanks Steve you’re the best."  -S.S.