Search Site
Menu
OSHA Supports Drivers Who Refuse to Violate the Law

Hours of service (HOS) regulations are intended to prevent truck drivers from driving while they are dangerously tired. Other Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) rules require sick leave for ill drivers and those taking prescription narcotics. These regulations protect all drivers and passengers from the serious tractor-trailer accidents that become more likely when a sick or exhausted truck driver is behind the wheel. Yet trucking companies often push their employees to work, regardless of their physical condition. Drivers may acquiesce out of fear of losing their jobs or being demoted to a less desirable shift.

In fact, this happened to one driver who worked for Oak Harbor Freight Lines, Inc. The driver notified his employer that he was too sick to drive and was under the influence of a narcotic cough suppressant prescribed by his doctor. In response, the company fired him.

Theodore Roosevelt said, “Knowing what’s right doesn’t mean much unless you do what’s right.” Both the employer and the driver knew that to drive while sick, tired and impaired would violate federal regulations. However, the employer chose to ignore the law, while the driver did what was right. He stood up for himself and eventually won his case, citing protection by the Surface Transportation Act, which prohibits an employer from taking action against an employee who refuses to operate a commercial vehicle for the following reasons:

  • If doing so would violate regulations, standards or orders pertaining to vehicle safety, health or security
  • If the driver fears serious injuries to her or himself or to the public because of a hazardous safety or security issue

U.S. Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) ordered the company to compensate the worker and to stop retaliating against workers who refuse to drive while too sleep-deprived or sick to drive safely. As OSHA’s Seattle regional administrator explained, “A company cannot place its attendance policies ahead of the safety of its drivers and that of the public.”

The laws protect workers who do what’s right. Consult a Dallas whistleblower lawyer to learn more about exercising your rights against workplace retaliation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Honors
Our Office
  • Dallas Office
    4514 Cole Ave
    #600
    Dallas, Texas 75205
    Phone: 214-306-8045
    Fax: 469-729-9926
Testimonials
  • "Steve Kardell was terrific in representing me in some very adversarial discussions with Citigroup and also later represented me in my testimony before the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission."  -Richard Bowen, Citigroup Whistleblower

  • "Incredible knowledge of employee related concerns and equally brilliant knowledge of health care regulations, standards of practice. I would recommend this firm to anyone."  -V.B.

  • "Reaching out to Steve Kardell was the best decision I made. His ability to provide immediate insight and direction was very powerful, and a huge relief during a very stressful time period. For anyone struggling with a whistleblower situation, I would highly recommend at least speaking with Steve. After a 10 minute call with him, I had a better understanding of what I was dealing with. Even better, he gave me some immediate hope. In the end Steve did a better job than I thought was possible. Steve was able to get in contact with people in my organization, that I didn’t have access to. Because of his years of experience, he already has contacts in many organizations in Dallas. The entire situation was handled peacefully. I was impressed by his ability to “keep the peace”–rather than creating a battle with the organization. The reason I didn’t reach out to a lawyer initially, was because I thought it would mean an immediate end to any hope of a positive relationship with the company. Steve was able to address my concerns, and in the end I was able to continue to work for them."  -KS

  • "Never thought my career would end like it did after 30 years of service. I was part of the first round of the so called reduction of force. I asked myself how can I be part of this with 30 years of seniority. How did they pick these 90 plus employees? Now, the culture of this organization made you question every decision they made. It wasn’t what you knew it’s was a culture of who you know. Nonetheless, I did not accept their severance package. I immediately starting looking for an attorney who would take on my case. After the initial call to Steve I had hope again. He was open and honest about everything and reassured me he would do his best for me, and he did. I had an awesome outcome. Thanks Steve you’re the best."  -S.S.

FOLLOW US
Facebook Twitter Linkedin RSS Feed JD Supra