Search Site
Menu
Memo Reveals Several Managers Knew of Medicaid Fraud in New Jersey Case

A state comptroller for New Jersey claimed that one of his employees acted of his own accord by discounting $2.6 million on how much certain fraudsters had to repay taxpayers for Medicaid. However, a new memo obtained by reporters indicates several levels of managers in the comptroller’s office knew about these deals, indicating an organized system of Medicaid fraud that could not be blamed on a single rogue worker.

The memo, written in 2017, contradicts Comptroller Philip J. Degnan’s claim that a single employee had overstepped his authority by slashing Medicaid paybacks by 50 percent. It was written by a former program supervisor and contains allegations that at least three managers — including one who served directly underneath Mr. Degnan — knew about the fraud. The memo also alleges the head of the office’s Medicaid Fraud Division even signed off on offering settlements.

The memo primarily dealt with an amnesty program offered by the comptroller’s office. The program had been controversial for some time. In 2017, 159 Ocean County residents sought amnesty after they reported receiving Medicaid benefits for which they were not eligible.

Denials from comptroller’s office

The comptroller’s office stated that all employees named in the memo deny having any conversations about such negotiations, and that internal investigations by the office did not result in any evidence other people knew the employee as offering Medicaid discounts.

Investigations revealed the employee was Andrew Poulos Jr., who worked for the state comptroller’s office from 2011 to December 12, 2017, the last day people were able to apply for the amnesty program. His job as supervisor of Medicaid fraud investigations was discontinued, according to public records.

The federal government takes a hard line against Medicaid and healthcare fraud. If you have information regarding such a fraudulent scheme, consult an experienced whistleblower attorney at Kardell Law Group to learn more about your legal options.

Honors
Our Office
  • Dallas Office
    4514 Cole Ave
    #600
    Dallas, Texas 75205
    Phone: 214-306-8045
    Fax: 469-729-9926
Testimonials
  • "Steve Kardell was terrific in representing me in some very adversarial discussions with Citigroup and also later represented me in my testimony before the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission."  -Richard Bowen, Citigroup Whistleblower

  • "Never thought my career would end like it did after 30 years of service. I was part of the first round of the so called reduction of force. I asked myself how can I be part of this with 30 years of seniority. How did they pick these 90 plus employees? Now, the culture of this organization made you question every decision they made. It wasn’t what you knew it’s was a culture of who you know. Nonetheless, I did not accept their severance package. I immediately starting looking for an attorney who would take on my case. After the initial call to Steve I had hope again. He was open and honest about everything and reassured me he would do his best for me, and he did. I had an awesome outcome. Thanks Steve you’re the best."  -S.S.

  • "Reaching out to Steve Kardell was the best decision I made. His ability to provide immediate insight and direction was very powerful, and a huge relief during a very stressful time period. For anyone struggling with a whistleblower situation, I would highly recommend at least speaking with Steve. After a 10 minute call with him, I had a better understanding of what I was dealing with. Even better, he gave me some immediate hope. In the end Steve did a better job than I thought was possible. Steve was able to get in contact with people in my organization, that I didn’t have access to. Because of his years of experience, he already has contacts in many organizations in Dallas. The entire situation was handled peacefully. I was impressed by his ability to “keep the peace”–rather than creating a battle with the organization. The reason I didn’t reach out to a lawyer initially, was because I thought it would mean an immediate end to any hope of a positive relationship with the company. Steve was able to address my concerns, and in the end I was able to continue to work for them."  -KS

FOLLOW US
Facebook Twitter Linkedin RSS Feed JD Supra