Search Site
Menu
Important Takeaways from the Most Recent SEC Whistleblower Award

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently issued an award resolving the claims of a pair of whistleblowers based on the same action filed against the same entities. However, while one of these whistleblowers got a $3.5 million payout, the other received nothing. Why exactly was this?

First, it is important to consider the fact that the SEC denies significantly more claims than it grants. Although the program has distributed approximately $135 million to 37 whistleblowers since beginning its award program in 2011, there are many more complaints for which the agency does not grant awards of any kind.

Missed deadline, lack of enforceable action to blame for denial

In this particular case, the SEC denied the second whistleblower’s claim for two main reasons. First, it was filed late. During the appeal process, the whistleblower argued the process for filing the claim and ultimately obtaining an award was unclear, and that the SEC should provide greater instruction to whistleblowers regarding the claims process. The agency disagreed, stating that its Notice of Covered Action and various other rules offer plenty of “constructive notice.”

The second whistleblower also did not provide information that directly resulted in the covered action’s successful enforcement. The first whistleblower, however, did submit information that was both credible and highly specific, and that played a key role in making the enforcement action possible. In fact, providing information that does not lead to a successful enforcement action is the most common reason why the SEC denies awards.

When whistleblowers do file their claims properly and provide information that leads to a successful enforcement action, they stand to earn a significant amount of money in rewards. To learn more about your options if you are aware of wrongdoing within a business or government agency, speak with a knowledgeable Dallas attorney at Whistleblower Law for Managers.

Honors
Our Office
  • Dallas Office
    4514 Cole Ave
    #600
    Dallas, Texas 75205
    Phone: 214-306-8045
    Fax: 469-729-9926
Testimonials
  • "Steve Kardell was terrific in representing me in some very adversarial discussions with Citigroup and also later represented me in my testimony before the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission."  -Richard Bowen, Citigroup Whistleblower

  • "Never thought my career would end like it did after 30 years of service. I was part of the first round of the so called reduction of force. I asked myself how can I be part of this with 30 years of seniority. How did they pick these 90 plus employees? Now, the culture of this organization made you question every decision they made. It wasn’t what you knew it’s was a culture of who you know. Nonetheless, I did not accept their severance package. I immediately starting looking for an attorney who would take on my case. After the initial call to Steve I had hope again. He was open and honest about everything and reassured me he would do his best for me, and he did. I had an awesome outcome. Thanks Steve you’re the best."  -S.S.

  • "Reaching out to Steve Kardell was the best decision I made. His ability to provide immediate insight and direction was very powerful, and a huge relief during a very stressful time period. For anyone struggling with a whistleblower situation, I would highly recommend at least speaking with Steve. After a 10 minute call with him, I had a better understanding of what I was dealing with. Even better, he gave me some immediate hope. In the end Steve did a better job than I thought was possible. Steve was able to get in contact with people in my organization, that I didn’t have access to. Because of his years of experience, he already has contacts in many organizations in Dallas. The entire situation was handled peacefully. I was impressed by his ability to “keep the peace”–rather than creating a battle with the organization. The reason I didn’t reach out to a lawyer initially, was because I thought it would mean an immediate end to any hope of a positive relationship with the company. Steve was able to address my concerns, and in the end I was able to continue to work for them."  -KS

FOLLOW US
Facebook Twitter Linkedin RSS Feed JD Supra