Search Site

D.C. Circuit Court Expands Privilege in Internal Corporate Investigations

There are numerous federal regulations requiring investigations into possible fraud, related to both mandatory disclosure and simply performing some fact gathering while seeking legal advice. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit recently ruled in In re Kellogg Brown & Root that investigations into possible fraud associated with these regulations are privileged.

In the case, the appeals court rejected the district court’s ruling that communications are only privileged if they wouldn’t have been made except for reasons of obtaining legal advice. Additionally, the court ruled that communications are privileged in situations not only where the investigation’s primary purpose is to offer legal advice, but also when it is merely one of the significant purposes of the internal investigation.

The case came about when Henry Barko filed a False Claims Act lawsuit against the company he previously worked for, Kellogg, Brown & Root (KBR). In the suit, Barko claimed that the organization inflated some costs of construction and other services in Iraq and then submitted those costs to the federal government for reimbursement. The company had already conducted an independent investigation of these allegations, but a non-attorney initiated the investigation and non-attorney investigators conducted all of the reports.

When the district court received KBR’s internal investigation documents, it realized they were created for the purpose of compliance with the mandatory disclosure rule rather than obtaining legal advice. The ruling by the appeals court indicates that obtaining legal advice was a significant purpose, if not the primary purpose.

This is a complicated area of law that is continuing to evolve, and one that affects whistleblowers across the United States. For more information about what this case could mean for other disclosure issues, speak with a knowledgeable Dallas attorney at Whistleblower Law for Managers.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Awards & Honors
Our Office
  • Dallas Office
    4514 Cole Ave
    Dallas, Texas 75205
    Phone: 214-306-8045
    Fax: 469-729-9926
As Seen In
In his new book, "Standing Up to China: How a Whistleblower Risked Everything for His Country," former client & Author, Ashley Yablon, quotes Attorney Steve Kardell about Whistelblower Law.
  • "Steve Kardell was terrific in representing me in some very adversarial discussions with Citigroup and also later represented me in my testimony before the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission."  -Richard Bowen, Citigroup Whistleblower

  • "Incredible knowledge of employee related concerns and equally brilliant knowledge of health care regulations, standards of practice. I would recommend this firm to anyone."  -V.B.

  • "Reaching out to Steve Kardell was the best decision I made. His ability to provide immediate insight and direction was very powerful, and a huge relief during a very stressful time period. For anyone struggling with a whistleblower situation, I would highly recommend at least speaking with Steve. After a 10 minute call with him, I had a better understanding of what I was dealing with. Even better, he gave me some immediate hope. In the end Steve did a better job than I thought was possible. Steve was able to get in contact with people in my organization, that I didn’t have access to. Because of his years of experience, he already has contacts in many organizations in Dallas. The entire situation was handled peacefully. I was impressed by his ability to “keep the peace”–rather than creating a battle with the organization. The reason I didn’t reach out to a lawyer initially, was because I thought it would mean an immediate end to any hope of a positive relationship with the company. Steve was able to address my concerns, and in the end I was able to continue to work for them."  -KS

  • "Never thought my career would end like it did after 30 years of service. I was part of the first round of the so called reduction of force. I asked myself how can I be part of this with 30 years of seniority. How did they pick these 90 plus employees? Now, the culture of this organization made you question every decision they made. It wasn’t what you knew it’s was a culture of who you know. Nonetheless, I did not accept their severance package. I immediately starting looking for an attorney who would take on my case. After the initial call to Steve I had hope again. He was open and honest about everything and reassured me he would do his best for me, and he did. I had an awesome outcome. Thanks Steve you’re the best."  -S.S.