Search Site
Menu

California Supreme Court Ruling Makes it More Difficult for Employers to Dismiss Whistleblower Retaliation Claims

A recent opinion from the California Supreme Court makes it more difficult for employers to avoid or dismiss claims of whistleblower retaliation.

The ruling came in the case of Wallen Lawson v. PPG Architectural Finishes Inc. The court unanimously decided to apply more lenient standards of evidence when evaluating whistleblower retaliation claims under the state’s Labor Code instead of using the burden-shifting test often applied in federal discrimination cases.

Case background

Previously the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California had ruled in favor of PPG, determining the McDonnell Douglas test would apply to the litigation. In that scenario, it would be the plaintiff’s responsibility to establish a prima facie case of discrimination or retaliation, and the company would only need to show it had a legitimate nondiscriminatory reason for the termination.

Upon appealing the case, the plaintiff argued the court should instead have used the more lenient framework laid out in Labor Code Section 1102.6, which gives the plaintiff the burden only to demonstrate whistleblowing was a “contributing factor” in dismissal.

The California Supreme Court acknowledged there would be some confusion in the evidentiary standards used, and said the state’s more lenient rules should be used in this type of case.

The effect is that it becomes more difficult for employers to escape whistleblower retaliation claims and the penalties they may face as a result of that retaliation. Experts recommend that employers review their company antiretaliation policies and lay out multiple avenues of reporting. In addition, all employees should be trained in what qualifies as whistleblower retaliation and the various legal protections available for whistleblowers.

To learn more about the steps you can take if you’ve been a victim of whistleblower retaliation, contact an experienced whistleblower lawyer at Kardell Law Group.

Honors
Our Office
  • Dallas Office
    4514 Cole Ave
    #600
    Dallas, Texas 75205
    Phone: 214-306-8045
    Fax: 469-729-9926
Testimonials
  • "Steve Kardell was terrific in representing me in some very adversarial discussions with Citigroup and also later represented me in my testimony before the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission."  -Richard Bowen, Citigroup Whistleblower

  • "Incredible knowledge of employee related concerns and equally brilliant knowledge of health care regulations, standards of practice. I would recommend this firm to anyone."  -V.B.

  • "Reaching out to Steve Kardell was the best decision I made. His ability to provide immediate insight and direction was very powerful, and a huge relief during a very stressful time period. For anyone struggling with a whistleblower situation, I would highly recommend at least speaking with Steve. After a 10 minute call with him, I had a better understanding of what I was dealing with. Even better, he gave me some immediate hope. In the end Steve did a better job than I thought was possible. Steve was able to get in contact with people in my organization, that I didn’t have access to. Because of his years of experience, he already has contacts in many organizations in Dallas. The entire situation was handled peacefully. I was impressed by his ability to “keep the peace”–rather than creating a battle with the organization. The reason I didn’t reach out to a lawyer initially, was because I thought it would mean an immediate end to any hope of a positive relationship with the company. Steve was able to address my concerns, and in the end I was able to continue to work for them."  -KS

  • "Never thought my career would end like it did after 30 years of service. I was part of the first round of the so called reduction of force. I asked myself how can I be part of this with 30 years of seniority. How did they pick these 90 plus employees? Now, the culture of this organization made you question every decision they made. It wasn’t what you knew it’s was a culture of who you know. Nonetheless, I did not accept their severance package. I immediately starting looking for an attorney who would take on my case. After the initial call to Steve I had hope again. He was open and honest about everything and reassured me he would do his best for me, and he did. I had an awesome outcome. Thanks Steve you’re the best."  -S.S.

FOLLOW US
Facebook Twitter Linkedin RSS Feed JD Supra