Search Site

Are You the Fox in the Henhouse? Whistleblower Protection in In-House Investigations

Daniel Ellsberg, Frank Serpico, Karen Silkwood, Jeffrey Wigand, Sharon Watkins and Floyd Landis — only a few names on the long list of people who blew the whistle on fraudulent business practices. In the past, whistleblowers often faced aggressive retaliation for their actions. Today, a raft of recent laws and legal decisions protects their rights.  What happens, though, when a whistleblower’s report triggers an internal investigation? How can whistleblowers protect themselves after their “cover” has been blown?

The 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOA) strengthened the regulation of financial practices and corporate governance. The SOA requires publicly held companies to have a procedure for receiving anonymous whistleblower reports about questionable accounting and auditing issues.  These anonymous tips must be investigated with the goal of identifying and correcting misconduct. Companies also hope their internal investigations will fend off probes by external agencies such as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The SOA encourages this kind of corporate self-scrutiny and self-correction of errors by setting a number of non-negotiable deadlines for compliance. However, this has significantly increased the number of internal investigations and the exposure of whistleblowers.

Involvement in internal investigations is almost inevitable today for whistleblowers. Even though you filed your report anonymously, the source is usually evident by the level of access required for knowledge of the wrongdoing. Once you have been “outed,” don’t expect the company attorneys to represent your best interests.  Their focus is on protecting the company. You need the assistance of a qualified attorney who represents your best interests and minimizes any possible consequences you may face.

SOA section 806 states that after receiving a whistleblower report, “no publicly traded company, or any officer, employee, contractor, subcontractor, or agent of such company may discharge, demote, suspend, threaten, harass, or in any other manner discriminate against an employee in the terms and conditions of employment because of any lawful act done by the employee.” However, an internal investigation is not considered a retaliatory action. Refusal to cooperate constitutes a reason to terminate your employment.  Again, a qualified attorney can guide you through the process of protecting your job.

Retaliating against whistleblowers is now a criminal offense, thanks to a new section to Title 18 of the U.S. Code. Infractions carry penalties from a large fine to 10 years in prison. The threshold for actionable retaliation has been lowered to any conduct that “could well dissuade a reasonable worker from filing a complaint” in the Supreme Court decision to Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. White.  It also extends protection against non-workplace-related retaliation.

A whistleblower has 90 days from the time of the adverse consequence of their activity to file a Sarbanes-Oxley complaint with the Department of Labor. Move quickly, with the experienced Texas whistleblower lawyers at the Law Office of Steve Kardell behind you, protecting your rights.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Awards & Honors
Our Office
  • Dallas Office
    4514 Cole Ave
    Dallas, Texas 75205
    Phone: 214-306-8045
    Fax: 469-729-9926
As Seen In
In his new book, "Standing Up to China: How a Whistleblower Risked Everything for His Country," former client & Author, Ashley Yablon, quotes Attorney Steve Kardell about Whistelblower Law.
  • "Steve Kardell was terrific in representing me in some very adversarial discussions with Citigroup and also later represented me in my testimony before the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission."  -Richard Bowen, Citigroup Whistleblower

  • "Incredible knowledge of employee related concerns and equally brilliant knowledge of health care regulations, standards of practice. I would recommend this firm to anyone."  -V.B.

  • "Reaching out to Steve Kardell was the best decision I made. His ability to provide immediate insight and direction was very powerful, and a huge relief during a very stressful time period. For anyone struggling with a whistleblower situation, I would highly recommend at least speaking with Steve. After a 10 minute call with him, I had a better understanding of what I was dealing with. Even better, he gave me some immediate hope. In the end Steve did a better job than I thought was possible. Steve was able to get in contact with people in my organization, that I didn’t have access to. Because of his years of experience, he already has contacts in many organizations in Dallas. The entire situation was handled peacefully. I was impressed by his ability to “keep the peace”–rather than creating a battle with the organization. The reason I didn’t reach out to a lawyer initially, was because I thought it would mean an immediate end to any hope of a positive relationship with the company. Steve was able to address my concerns, and in the end I was able to continue to work for them."  -KS

  • "Never thought my career would end like it did after 30 years of service. I was part of the first round of the so called reduction of force. I asked myself how can I be part of this with 30 years of seniority. How did they pick these 90 plus employees? Now, the culture of this organization made you question every decision they made. It wasn’t what you knew it’s was a culture of who you know. Nonetheless, I did not accept their severance package. I immediately starting looking for an attorney who would take on my case. After the initial call to Steve I had hope again. He was open and honest about everything and reassured me he would do his best for me, and he did. I had an awesome outcome. Thanks Steve you’re the best."  -S.S.