Search Site
Menu
ACA Whistleblower Claim Revived by Justice Department Review Board

The U.S. Department of Labor’s Administrative Review Board recently revived a Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) claim made by a whistleblower who was a former nurse at the Medical Center of Aurora. The board says an administrative law judge was mistaken in finding she did not meet the requirements for an ACA whistleblower claim.

In allowing the case to proceed, the board referenced its decision in the 2012 case Evans v. U.S. EPA, in which the standard was established that the plaintiff needed only to allege “some facts” on the protected activity in question and show “some relatedness” about the statutes in question. According to the board, the plaintiff, Kitty Gallas, did meet either of those minimum standards.

History of the dispute

The dispute dates back to 2013, when Gallas made her first complaint that the TeleMental Health program introduced by the hospital ignored certain medical standards requiring all psychiatric health assessments to be conducted in person. She raised these concerns with her supervisors, arguing the program violated federal law, but the supervisors responded that they believed the program was compliant with the law.

Gallas regularly refused to conduct these assessments remotely, telling the hospital that her participation in the program could put her license in jeopardy. Her supervisors then warned her she would be fired if she did not participate. The hospital did end up firing her in July 2014.

Soon after her termination, Gallas filed a complaint with the Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration, claiming she was improperly terminated for reporting the violations. She also filed retaliation claims under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the Affordable Care Act.

Gallas can now proceed with her ACA case, thanks to the decision by the DOL’s Administrative Review Board.

For further guidance on your legal options if you discover wrongdoing on the part of your employer, speak with a knowledgeable Dallas attorney at Whistleblower Law for Managers.

Honors
Our Office
  • Dallas Office
    4514 Cole Ave
    #600
    Dallas, Texas 75205
    Phone: 214-306-8045
    Fax: 469-729-9926
Testimonials
  • "Steve Kardell was terrific in representing me in some very adversarial discussions with Citigroup and also later represented me in my testimony before the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission."  -Richard Bowen, Citigroup Whistleblower

  • "Never thought my career would end like it did after 30 years of service. I was part of the first round of the so called reduction of force. I asked myself how can I be part of this with 30 years of seniority. How did they pick these 90 plus employees? Now, the culture of this organization made you question every decision they made. It wasn’t what you knew it’s was a culture of who you know. Nonetheless, I did not accept their severance package. I immediately starting looking for an attorney who would take on my case. After the initial call to Steve I had hope again. He was open and honest about everything and reassured me he would do his best for me, and he did. I had an awesome outcome. Thanks Steve you’re the best."  -S.S.

  • "Reaching out to Steve Kardell was the best decision I made. His ability to provide immediate insight and direction was very powerful, and a huge relief during a very stressful time period. For anyone struggling with a whistleblower situation, I would highly recommend at least speaking with Steve. After a 10 minute call with him, I had a better understanding of what I was dealing with. Even better, he gave me some immediate hope. In the end Steve did a better job than I thought was possible. Steve was able to get in contact with people in my organization, that I didn’t have access to. Because of his years of experience, he already has contacts in many organizations in Dallas. The entire situation was handled peacefully. I was impressed by his ability to “keep the peace”–rather than creating a battle with the organization. The reason I didn’t reach out to a lawyer initially, was because I thought it would mean an immediate end to any hope of a positive relationship with the company. Steve was able to address my concerns, and in the end I was able to continue to work for them."  -KS

FOLLOW US
Facebook Twitter Linkedin RSS Feed JD Supra